NewsHeadlines

Pashinyan’s remarks at Global Summit question Armenian patriotism

Armenian PM Nikol Pashinyan speaks at the Global Armenian Summit (Photo: RA Prime Minister’s office, September 18, 2024)

YEREVAN—During the Second Armenian Global Summit on September 18, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan suggested that the model of patriotism prevalent among Armenians, including in the Diaspora, dilutes the essence of Armenian statehood.

Already a subscriber?Log in here

This story is FREE for you...

Create a free account to access this and four more articles, and get more sent to you with our e-newsletter.

Or, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.

Hoory Minoyan

Hoory Minoyan was an active member of the Armenian community in Los Angeles until she moved to Armenia prior to the 44-day war. She graduated with a master's in International Affairs from Boston University, where she was also the recipient of the William R. Keylor Travel Grant. The research and interviews she conducted while in Armenia later became the foundation of her Master’s thesis, “Shaping Identity Through Conflict: The Armenian Experience.” Hoory continues to follow her passion for research and writing by contributing to the Armenian Weekly.

3 Comments

  1. I grew up in the diaspora and have been an active member of our diaspora communities, and while it stings to hear the deductions about our communities by the PM, I largely agree with him. There is a major disconnect with many of our diaspora communities and the Republic of Armenia. Many of us carry an idealized version about what Armenia ‘should be’ without giving much consideration of what the people living there actually want and need. Making toasts and singing fedayi songs doesn’t develop the country and improve the lives of the people living there. This takes repatriation, investment, knowledge sharing, and active engagement with Armenians in Armenia.

    1. @Aris all so true diaspora tend to have a more strong view of the ancestral lands and historical issues than those in the homeland. It can be as naive as simple bucolic views but can often carry a bitterness. There can be a tendancey for example to be more Armenian than those kith and kin in Armenia. For example the Polish who left as a result of WW2 tend to have a more angry view of Russia than those who left for opportunity when it joined the EU. The Irish who left with the famine and aftermath often going to Boston near Watertown so likely that some readers will have encountered them traditionally had stronger views about Britain compared to those who stayed behind.

      Separately the OSCE is increasingly moribund in its own right internationally and the breakdown of relations with partners USA and France with Russia renders it’s validity questionable. However it should only be dissolved after a peace agreement unless the OSCE collapses in which case it’s invalid anyway.

Back to top button