Opinion

Can Armenia become a new Georgia?

As the Artsakh blockade imposed by Azerbaijan entered its second month with no end in sight, the Armenian government increased the level of criticism of Russia. The new phase of anti-Russian rhetoric was launched by the secretary of the Security Council, who, in late December 2022, publicly claimed that Russia was using the closure of the Lachin Corridor to force Armenia to join the union state of Russia and Belarus and open an “exterritorial corridor” to Azerbaijan’s Nakhichevan exclave v

Already a subscriber?Log in here

This story is FREE for you...

Create a free account to access this and four more articles, and get more sent to you with our e-newsletter.

Or, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.

Dr. Benyamin Poghosyan

Dr. Benyamin Poghosyan is the founder and chairman of the Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies and a senior research fellow at APRI – Armenia. He was the former vice president for research – head of the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense Research University in Armenia. In March 2009, he joined the Institute for National Strategic Studies as a research Fellow and was appointed as INSS Deputy Director for research in November 2010. Dr. Poghosyan has prepared and managed the elaboration of more than 100 policy papers which were presented to the political-military leadership of Armenia, including the president, the prime minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs. Dr. Poghosyan has participated in more than 50 international conferences and workshops on regional and international security dynamics. His research focuses on the geopolitics of the South Caucasus and the Middle East, US – Russian relations and their implications for the region, as well as the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative. He is the author of more than 200 academic papers and articles in different leading Armenian and international journals. In 2013, Dr. Poghosyan was a Distinguished Research Fellow at the US National Defense University College of International Security Affairs. He is a graduate from the US State Department Study of the US Institutes for Scholars 2012 Program on US National Security Policy Making. He holds a PhD in history and is a graduate from the 2006 Tavitian Program on International Relations at Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.

5 Comments

  1. We shouldnt betray to lran and russia for west they never supported armenia,they didnt help armenians when armenians suffered during lebanese civil war also syria and lraq egypt pogroms against christians

  2. The enemies of Armenia have always been Azerbaijan and Turkey. For Pashinyan to support the western narrative for Armenia, these talking points are also shared with the anti-Russian terrorist organizations, i.e. Sasna Dzrer and its morphed National Democratic Alliance party (no coincidence). The only deductive conclusion one can make is, if the Russians vacate Armenia, Turkey will fill-in that void. Whether our Russian and Iranian neighbors will enjoy a NATO front in the southern caucuses, this would be a new scenario that would need critical analysis and the input of our centuries old partners of Armenia.

  3. Independence from Russia will only result in dependence on Turkey. Our professional Russophobes understand this very well. The only thing our 30 year old independence has shown us is that we are not ready for independence. Armenia would be much better off as part of the Russian Federation. The only question is after all this would Russians be willing to take us back.

  4. What exactly has 30 years of Russian presence in Armenia accomplished? The notion that Russia somehow guarantees security to Armenia has been a myth for 30 years now. It takes a dictator to know a dictator. The Tsarist regime that rules Russia(Putin) empathizes more with dictators like Aliev than they do with a more democratic Pashinyan. Russia is a hostile 2 faced state using problems of Armenia against Armenians in an ongoing effort to keep dependence on Russia. The problem is alliance with Russia means absolutely nothing and not just for Armenia but for any other country. Russia looks at its allies as nothing more than subjects or henchmen rather than worthy partners and friends. It is no surprise that the Eastern European countries have moved away from Russia and toward the direction of NATO. Armenia is long overdue of this movement. The current government of Armenia is making the right decision by moving away from Russia. This won’t happen overnight but I’m certain it will in the next 4-10 years. As far as Iran, I strongly disagree that the West will be hostile to Armenia just because we have some relations with Iran. Armenia shares a border with Iran so it is vital to it’s economy and the West will likely tolerate that. Let’s not forget that Turkey and Iran are major trade partners. Turkey, being a NATO member does not seem to get any lecture from the West on that matter. As far as Azerbaijan, the Western leaders have made it clear to dictator Aliev in September that military invasion will not be tolerated. Plus, the presence of Western military, namely French and American peacekeepers in Artsakh will get a better insight on who the aggressor is if it’s not clear at this point. Also, Armenia not being bound the Russia and CSTO will have the ability to purchase better technology from France and US to deter any aggression from Azerbaijan.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Back to top button