Op-Eds

Hillary Clinton’s ‘Flip-Floppery’ on Genocide

Few people can honestly dispute Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (HRC) record of ‘flip-floppery’—and that her flip-flop record is lengthy…

The North American Free Trade Agreement, Trans-Pacific Partnership, Cuban embargo, Keystone oil pipeline, sanctuary cities, same-sex marriage, charter schools, and more.

Already a subscriber?Log in here

This story is FREE for you...

Create a free account to access this and four more articles, and get more sent to you with our e-newsletter.

Or, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.

David Boyajian

David Boyajian is an Armenian American freelance journalist.

22 Comments

  1. Yet this paper still supports voting for her? I can’t imagine why someone so flippant concerning Armenian issues and human rights issues would find favor in your eyes.
    Meanwhile Donald Trump is probably so uncalculating that he’ll label the genocide properly very early. After all, Erdogan is no friend of his.

  2. ‘If we also recall that President Bill Clinton refused to label as “genocide” the 1994 Rwandan mass murders, it is clear that genocide denial or diminishment goes far beyond the Armenian case.’ More crucial than Bill’s ‘non-labeling’ of Rwanda as genocide is the fact that he did not lift a finger to prevent the genocide when it was in his power to do so. One wonders if the First Lady at the time ever raised the matter with her husband at the kitchen table.

  3. Well written and factual.
    Sadly, politics is always influenced by “dirty money” and the Clintons have been master manipulators of money flows and contributions whether made to their political campaigns or the Clinton Foundation.
    Raises serious questions and doubts about their integrity and honesty.
    Think well and review the facts before you cast your vote.
    Vart Adjemian

  4. Why do you continue trying to make american politicians acknowledge the Armenian Genocide? surely by now you would have known that these people do not want to mention the “G” word – it’s a political game – they are all ready to talk about it and mention the genocide but when the time comes that they will take office they change the tune – it’s called “convenience”. Remember Obama? You really cannot take these people seriously. turkey is an ally remember? check the same issue with israel – they don’t care, they have turkish and NOT Armenian interests in mind.

  5. A good update on where Clinton stands regarding the greatest crime against humanity. She is just one of many hawks in U.S. politics.

    I’m not a fan of either major candidate in this year’s elections. I don’t see this article as an endorsement of Trump for president. It simply states where Hilary is on genocide and Syria…issues of great import to many in addition to the Armenians. Trump doesn’t have a record on the Armenian genocide or Armenian issues, as far as we know. The article’s author cites a Republican, Dennis Hastert, as having helped President Clinton quash an Armenia genocide resolution. The article also says that other U.S. officials besides Hillary have done similar Armenian genocide flip flops.

  6. Hillary is a criminal, period. It is not just what she says about the genocide but the level of corruption under the democrats. Who ever doubted that Clinton was not for sale to the highest bidder?

  7. Impossible to vote for donald trump.
    Dark deed that Putin is bombing Aleppo, a friend sic of the ARMENIANS.
    TURKEY is DEPLORABLE; donald trump doesn’t know where he stands on anything, except
    himself.
    I am voting for Hillary Clinton.
    I LOVE the ARMENIANS!

    1. If you love the Armenians, it would be better for you to praise Putin rather than condemn him. The self-legitimized liars of the Mainstream Media have been lying to you and every other American, because that’s what they do best.

      About Aleppo, just to let you know about its reality: Aleppo is now divided into two parts, the main western part in which there are more than a million residents, where all the real Syrians live, including the Armenian community, and which is under the protection of the the Syrian government and Russia. Here Syrians are trying to live a normal life thanks to this protection, although it is difficult to do so with mercenary terrorists all around. Then there is the eastern part, surrounded by the Syrian army, and which has up to two hundred thousand residents, including Syrian Sunnis, ALqaeda, Alnusra, ISIS, their extended families and foreign invaders from places like Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Turkey, etc which are there for the sole purpose of terrorizing Syrians and toppling the Syrian secular government and turning Syria into an Islamist wasteland. This is where “Putin is bombing” according to the liars of the American media. Needless to say, the terrorists of east Aleppo, which do not belong there, have been given the opportunity to leave, and they have refused by orders from Saudi Arabia, Turkey and NATO. So the suffering in east Aleppo is on this latter group, not the Syrian and Russian governments.

      Only one month ago, the terrorists from east Aleppo started bombing western Aleppo, in which several Armenians were killed including two adolescents, a promising Armenian champion swimmer and her brother. Did you hear anything about it from the liars at CNN, FOX, MSNBC, etc? Of course you didn’t – it does not fit their false narrative of Syria.

    2. IToo bad. She is a thief, a liar and and possibly the most despicable person in the world. I often think she is the spawn of Satan. Good luck to you and hopefully you will be able to live with your decision.

  8. let’s concentrate on the states which most of them have approved of the WORDS. let’s also concentrate on all the other countries that will approve, that I believe will be most of them.
    what is the u.s. going to do then.

  9. Yet many democrat Armenians, I know vote for Hillary. Party aside we are voting for the individual who is running for the presidency. On the other hand, Trump could recognize the Armenian Genocide, because he is Christian & do not like Erdoghan.

    1. “because he is Christian”

      Really? He lies and exaggerates, cheats people, his charitable foundation does not contribute to charities and has cheated on his wives? What makes him Christian?

      That said, I don’t see how Clinton will be good for Armenia. Then again, i don’t see how Trump will be good for the USA. We don’t even know how he will be for Armenia.

  10. Clinton’s mattress must stink because they been in bed for many years with the rest of corrupt US politicians

  11. As always, I don’t think it is going to matter for Armenians (and not even for Americans in general) who becomes president, there are invisible forces which always call the shots and which we have no control over. So whichever side Armenians vote for, it boils down to personal choice. But I have some observations for the presidency.

    If Trump had deflated his ego and mostly kept his mouth shut, he may have stood a chance, because he has some good ideas from a business perspective, jobs for Americans, and also the correct attitude towards Russia and Syria. But unfortunately for him, Hillary has all the inside connections and represents all the interests of Washington insiders, big corporations, banks, Saudis, Israelis, the media etc. which is why she will most likely win. The “traditional establishment” mentioned above is also terrified of a Trump presidency because regardless of what Trump says, in their view he remains “unpredictable” – a big no no for “the establishment”… they need a predictable puppet like Hillary which they have already invested in to keep their interests intact. In my view neither of these two are qualified to be POTUS, and neither are the other two candidates. The presidency of the United States is now at its lowest point in its history, but perhaps it is a perfect representation of the state of the American public with it quickly eroding morals.

    Its also unfortunate that the women of America think that “they are doing the right thing by voting for a woman – because – she is a woman”. Is that the only ‘positive’ reason we can come up with? This is the same as the Obama effect 8 years ago, which is also why Clinton is the extended term of Obama as well. I would welcome the first female American president, but I think Hillary is not it for me (not that Trump is either).

    I find the notion that “Hillary represents the interest of women and gays” to be quite ironic funny – considering she is funded by the same insane Wahabists of Saudi Arabia which also fund ISIS and who proudly repress the same people and groups Hillary claims to represent.

    However, I will admit there is a possibility of a silver lining for either presidency: a Trump presidency will likely bring more peace in the Middle East thus positively affecting Armenians. And with a Clinton presidency: 1. Her relations with Erdogan are not rosy and she might put him and Turkey in its place. 2. The puppets of the USA – ‘Islamist nations’ – will be confronted with a woman as their overlord, making for some fun times.

    Lastly I will pose a question: what happens if at the last week one of the two candidates “suddenly” give the Armenian Genocide Recognition an Obama-inspired promise, will we all support that candidate regardless?

  12. Hilary clinton’s flip-flop will continue as she will be the next president.
    what a shame for us to be in such a position. but we have resilience.
    we will never give up and because of that, we will succeed.

  13. Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy is dangerous for Armenians. Destabilizing Syria and thus eradicating the Armenian presence in Aleppo. Being hostile toward Russia and undermining it(Russia is the only strong Ally Armenia has right now). And she has made clear she will not recognize the Genocide. We do know that Trump wants improved relations with Russia. that’s good enough for me. Even though i don’t expect him to recognize the Genocide either.

  14. Turkish Denialism and the Clintons: How many people know that the board members of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs include Huma Abedin’s mother, Saleha Abedin, as Editor; Huma Abedin’s brother, Hassan Abedin, as Associates Editor; and M. Hakan Yavuz, Prof. of Political Science at the University of Utah, who also serves as Book Review Editor for this organization? Yavuz is on the editorial board of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, which is a publication of the IMMA. The latter was co-founded by the Abedins.

    Yavuz is currently the leading “academic” apologist in the United States for Turkish denial of the Armenian Genocide. He is grooming these graduate students as future Armenian Genocide deniers and revisionists. He is the organizer of the Turkish Studies Project at the Univ. of Utah. He is responsible for helping to create the Utah Series in Turkish and Islamic Studies (currently known as the “Utah Series in Middle East Studies”), which has published a number of Armenian Genocide denialist / revisionist books on the Armenian Genocide including:

    1.) The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey :: University Press Catalog by Guenter Lewy.

    2.) The Armenian Rebellion at Van :: University Press Catalog by Justin McCarthy.

    3.) The Turk in America :: University Press Catalog by Justin McCarthy.

    Not surprised by the Abedin family’s direct connection to Yavuz, and the U.S. government’s complicity in setting up such an “academic” chair at the Univ. of Utah.

    Either way you slice it, Yavuz and the Turkish Studies Project at the Univ. of Utah are closely connected to the Clintons.

  15. I’d be fascinated to know what commenters have to say in 2020 and beyond about Trump and his administration refusing to even acknowledge the fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan, let alone directly call for peace talks. Trump has sidled up to Turkey in ways only the most stubborn would insist Hillary Clinton would have.

    I’m sorry, but the politician with the better understanding of geo-politics is always better option for Commander-in-Chief, especially if she was a friggin’ diplomat. And all the whining about flip-flopping, while even more pathetic considering how Trump turned out, is always ridiculous to me. A flip-flopping politician is a politician who can be reasoned with. Give me a flip-flopper over a resolute demagogue any day. The last four years were a waste thanks to this kind of shortsightedness.

Back to top button