NewsHeadlines

Armenia and U.S. sign Strategic Partnership Charter

Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken meet in Washington (Photo: Secretary Antony Blinken, X, January 14, 2025)

YEREVAN—In a significant shift for Armenia’s foreign policy, Armenia and the United States signed a Strategic Partnership Charter on January 14, 2025, in Washington, D.C. The agreement was signed by Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, setting the stage for enhanced bilateral cooperation across multiple sectors.

Already a subscriber?Log in here

This story is FREE for you...

Create a free account to access this and four more articles, and get more sent to you with our e-newsletter.

Or, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.

Hoory Minoyan

Hoory Minoyan was an active member of the Armenian community in Los Angeles until she moved to Armenia prior to the 44-day war. She graduated with a master's in International Affairs from Boston University, where she was also the recipient of the William R. Keylor Travel Grant. The research and interviews she conducted while in Armenia later became the foundation of her Master’s thesis, “Shaping Identity Through Conflict: The Armenian Experience.” Hoory continues to follow her passion for research and writing by contributing to the Armenian Weekly.

20 Comments

  1. Delusional and meaningless.

    99.99% of Americans can’t find Armenia on a map.

    The Americans are not going to bomb Turkey when the Turks invade.

    The only people who will support this are the ones who failed their geography exams at school.

    1. Dont Forget that France has pledged full military support in case Azerbaijan or Turkey try to pressure the opening of the sa called Zangezur corridor. Iran has pledged time and time also in the meting of the Iranian president and Pashinyan , the Iranian president repeated that Iran’s supreme leader has emphasized again that any interference of Azerbaijan in the Siunic province of Armenian will result a military action by Iran. In short , the question of the so called Zangezur corridor is a NO.

      1. Azerbaijan already attacked Armenia and is occupying 200 km2 of Armenia’s territory since 2021.

        The French did nothing, will do nothing and can do nothing from afar.

        Turkey (Azerbaijan’s big brother and ally, which won Azerbaijan’s war in Artsakh for them) and Georgia (which is increasingly coming under the Russian orbit) would not allow the French to use their airspace and territory to aid Armenia.

        Turkey always blocks its airspace to military planes, and also blocks flights by Western politicians, to Armenia.

        Military aid to Armenia only comes via Georgian airspace. Whether Georgia will continue to open its airspace for military aid for Armenia, looks uncertain, if it does the bidding of Russia.

        Would the French come via Iran? Very unlikely, since Iran’s relations with France and the West are very strained, just like Russia. All of Armenia’s neighbors oppose the presence of Western troops. If Armenia indeed aligns with the West, especially with its enemy the US, Iran won’t come to the aid of Armenia either, even though it is opposed to the land corridor in Syunik.

        Pashinyan is not a chess player, but a very bad gambler.

  2. This agreement is a fantasy and a big foreign policy blunder, one of the many disastrous foreign policy blunders by the totally inept and reckless Pashinyan/Mirzoyan duo.

    It won’t provide any benefits, any contribution to Armenia. It is symbolic and will remain so on paper.

    Will the United States or the West come to the aid of Armenia, when it is attacked? No. They didn’t then and won’t in the future.

    Apart from alienating Russia even further, it will also alienate Iran, which is Armenia’s only friendly neighbor left – not that they helped Armenia during the Second Artsakh War and against Azerbaijan’s continuing occupation of Armenia’s territory, and very likely won’t in the future, if Armenia’s Syunik Province is indeed attacked and grabbed by Azerbaijan.

    It is a fantasy to expect a landlocked country in Western Asia, far from Europe and very far from the United States, like Armenia, which is surrounded by hostile neighbors, which are all anti-West (including the increasingly authoritarian Georgia), to become part of the Western World, part of the EU and part of NATO (which would be blocked by NATO member Turkey).

    Aligning openly with one side – and with absolutely no security guarantees whatsoever, in this case with the United States and the West, will only spell trouble for Armenia, and unite all its neighbors against Armenia.

    Instead of openly choosing a side that will only harm Armenia even further, Armenia needs to pursue a smart Machiavellian foreign policy that is based on Realpolitik and not on fantasies.

    But with the disastrous Pashinyan/Mirzoyan duo at the helm, Armenia is lurching from one disaster to the next.

    1. But it is already Machiavellian. Maybe you haven’t noticed. Also, Georgia is not anti-Western.

      1. I wish Armenia’s foreign policy was Machiavellian. As master strategists, Metternich’s, Bismarck’s or Kissinger’s foreign policy were Machiavellian, and were very successful. Pashinyan’s “foreign policy”, if one may call it that, is downright reckless and perilous, and is equivalent of playing Russian roulette with the well-being, security and destiny of Armenia. Georgia is gradually becoming authoritarian and is turning away from Europe, whose relations with them have become strained as a result. Georgia, which is Armenia’s “lifeline”, may become compromised, especially if Armenia becomes firmly pro-West (anti-Russian in Russia’s eyes) and Georgia becomes anti-West and pro-Russian.

  3. This clearly and definitely is not a military alliance between Armenia and the United States. It is the next move, among many, by the US intended more to send a message to neighboring countries, Iran-Artificial Azerbaijan-Russia, than anything else and Armenia is once again being used in the process. I think by this move US is trying to send a message to Iran primarily that US will now have much more of a presence in the region and in Iran’s backyard in particular now that all Iran’s proxies, Assad-Hamas-Hezbollah, have been toppled and set back decades in terms of their military strength. Assad seems to have been the middleman between Iran and the other two in terms to Iran’s military assistance and arms transfers used against Iran’s arch-enemy and US’s closest ally Israel. That link and connection has been broken and it no longer exists which has weakened Iran’s influence in that part of the world and made Iran much more vulnerable and even more isolated at home. In the case of our arch-enemy artificial Azerbaijan, US is trying to force their hands to choose where they stand in terms of their alliance with the West and Russia, since they have been flip-flopping between the two lately, and US is doing this by standing firm, on the surface and on paper only, for Armenia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, meaning they will be watching Azerbaijani criminal activities much more closely which may or may not be a deterrence for their further attacks on Armenian interests, but without any mention of joint Turkish-Azerbaijani ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Armenians from Artsakh and their right of return. As far as Russia is concerned, given their ambivalence in this conflict brought about by the election of western-oriented Pashinyan and the war in Ukraine, they may be forced to either improve their relations with Armenia since they need Armenia and want to keep it in their orbit or this may cause Russia to become even more hostile towards Armenia and show that hostility via Azerbaijan.

    Furthermore, assuming there is any substance to this joint agreement between the US and Armenia, this move by US has placed our Azerbaijani arch-enemy in a very uncomfortable situation because they obviously don’t want to be pushed to get any closer to Russia as a result of this move by the US with their Armenian arch-enemy than they need to and only when they can exploit the rift between Armenia and Russia but that now there will be many more western observers watching their anti-Armenian activities which will throw a monkey wrench into their long-term plans, that is to sabotage or disrupt their intended plans, which will force them to weigh the pros and cons of working with or against the US. Their alternative is having an antagonistic relations with the US as a result of this treaty and forge a much closer relations with Turkey which ultimately wants to turn artificial Azerbaijan into a Turkish province and the US arch-enemy Russia which they worked for three decades to get rid of from their backyard. We shall see.

    1. @ Ararat, interesting points made. Azerbaijan which had seemingly played it well post 1994 may well be losing the plot. Whilst it’s warm relationship with Israel no doubt put them in good stead in Washington. It’s increasingly warm relationship with Russia is something that Israel can’t help them greatly should the USA take an unfavorable view of Azerbaijan friendship with Russia, indeed Rhodesia, South Africa and Serbia were nations who were at odds with the USA whilst Israel seemed all friendly yet it’s clear Israel knew who mattered and possibly playing good cop to USA bad cop indeed it seems that Russia too has fallen for this trick, Putin despite the decline of relationships with the USA Israel best ally still maintained a cordial relationship with Israel. Indeed to this end wouldn’t supply Assad’s Syria with defensive weapons against Israeli attacks and seemed to think that by not supporting Syria when attacked by Israel let alone Iran and Hezbollah whom it would cooperate with against militants such as Islamic state that it could avoid being tied to them what seemed to have been lost on Putin was that Russia fate in Syria was actually tied to theirs as was clear with the collapse of Hezbollah and Iran in Syria indeed Iran had long suspicions of Russian betrayal and Kremlin shill Andrew korybko would write in global research about Russia and Israel coordinating circumstances for Iranian departure from Syria. Syria kept weak by Russia and suspected and now since overthrow revealing papers in the Presidential palace was in fact seeking to distance from Iran to curry favour with Arabs and assuage Israel. After all it would have the increasingly hollow and pathetic “reserves the right to respond” in regard to Israeli attacks. Armenia has every right to review it’s relationship with Russia it had been a major supplier of weapons to Azerbaijan along with sidekick Belarus and CTSO ally Kazakhstan commended Azerbaijan in 2020 I’m not sure of the posture of Kyrgyzstan although Turkic would favour Azerbaijan and Tajikistan as Iranian might have been more sympathetic to Armenia. Thus what’s the point of being in such an alliance. Currently relationship between Russia and Azerbaijan has been strained by the plane shootdown and more significantly the nonsense stated by Russia of the circumstances and their plausible claim that Russia by not allowing the damaged plane to land as intended or nearby in Russia although it could have tried to return to Azerbaijan? and hoping it would crash in the Caspian sea rendering it much harder to demonstrate what actually happened. Azerbaijan justified actually anger with Russia is on the principle of not what was done, an accident although poor management not to have closed the airspace in response to drone attacks but what was done not allowing the damaged plane to land and said the gas cylinder explosion and flock of birds lies when the plane was struck by missile shrapnel as clear on the tail of the plane. Also interesting was Ukraine which had been pro Azerbaijan declined to accept Azeri proposal for a gas swap with the pipeline transit which came to an end on New year’s day so the gas originating in Russia would have been sold to Azerbaijan who would supply Russia with gas from it’s own wells. It’s likely that the friendship agreement between Russia and Azerbaijan on the eve of Russia invasion of Ukraine something of which Azerbaijan state services like most countries in the world must have sensed was imminent hasn’t passed unoticed in Ukraine and USA, thus could be said that Azerbaijan which had generally managed a more dynamic foreign policy post independence than Armenia may well be losing it’s touch. Although as thick as thieves Turkey and Azerbaijan do have differences Azeris resent Turkish dominance and their obvious second fiddle status and the Turks being more bastardised from the original Turanians in turn the Turks especially the westerners regard the Azeris as culturally backward and having the wrong form of Islam and despotic personality cult tendancies around the Alyiev clan note that Erdogan doesn’t foster a personality cult to Alyiev extent. Perhaps Russia will have to learn to look after it’s friends better if it wants to keep them such as Armenia and Syria… In turn as Armenia has had to learn not to be beholden to a single power and think that as it’s only legal ally in the area that it would always have the full support of Russia and how previous policies of selling national assets to Russia didn’t bind Russia to Armenia and it’s interests but allowed them to exploit monopolise and take Armenia for granted. As for the relationship with Iran, who along with Europe opposes the principle of an Azeri corridor through Armenia putting it at odds with Russia. Armenia should resist pressure to serve as an anti Iran front, citing the ancient cordiality between the Armenian and Iranian people’s it should be noted that the USA and Israel are intent on overthrowing the clerical regime, noting it’s setbacks the that Russia doesn’t in accordance with Byzantine strategy protect its allies to a meaningful extent it seems thus IF in the event of the clerical regime being ousted and a USA friendly regime put in place there is no reason that Armenia and Iran can’t continue their ancient cordiality and have Less obstruction from Russia such as it’s hobbling the gas pipeline from Iran to 700mm bore upon reaching Armenia where in Iran it’s 1450mm so don’t feel too sorry for Russia losing it’s gas market through lawfare and warfare it hobbled Armenia chances as a transit country to Europe when Armenia was a dutifully loyal country.

  4. Perhaps a balanced survey of Americans perhaps excluding those of Armenian ancestry should be done to determine whether it really is 99.99% or 1 in 10’000 who can’t find Armenia on the map, before quoting this cliché.

    Given the imminent end of the Biden government it’s an odd action for Armenia to take although it’s also an anti Turkey action of the USA reflecting the distance between the two and Biden own longstanding distrust of Turkey.

  5. A 10 year old child can look at a map and immediately know what Armenia’s policy should be.

    Pashinyan is 49 and worse than a child, delusionally chasing after a chimera

    It is to be hoped that there are enough Armenians who know Geography and who can avoid disaster.

  6. Its nice to have friends like France and the USA but remember that the only smart thing
    for Armenia to do is now to build up immediately a modern and strong Army Remember when Aliev kick out 120 000 Armenians from Artsakh no one came to our help .Neither France neither the USA. Remember there s no oil or gas in Armenia. Armenia must build up its army . No one is coming to fight for us. The Kurds say we have no friends but our mountains, And so is the same for Armenians we have no friends but our mountains

  7. “It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal.”

    – Henry Kissinger

    1. I now see why they say Gurgens are smart :)

      Everybody, including Nikol’s Soros financed regime, knows that the US couldn’t care less about Armenia and/or Armenians. Nikol is just setting the stage for the loss of Syunik. He wants to give Turks and Azeris their corridor but he first needs a scapegoat to blame. Ultimately, that scapegoat is Russia. Since Russians are embroiled in an existential war against the collective West in Ukraine, and therefore have more important things to do than babysit Armenia’s “wilding” peasantry, Nikol knows he has a window of opportunity…

  8. If Pashinyan wanted to gift a corridor through Armenia he would have done it in late 2020 early 2021 . Russia currently reducing its presence and distrusted due to its failure to uphold it’s obligations to Armenians in Arktash. Would spitefully be happy to see Armenia further mutilated . Remember Russia would never defend Syria against Israeli attacks and refuse to provide Syria with defensive weapons for such and arranged deals with Turkey allowing them presence and thought that by not supporting Iran and Hezbollah whom it would coordinate with against militants when they were attacked by Israel it would avoid it’s fate being tied to theirs as we all know their collapse in Syria which left Assad who was decrepit exposed and his collapse means that the efforts have fallen apart and Russia will have to withdraw from Syria. Pashinyan can’t be blamed for ANY of the failure of Russian interests in Syria due to its Byzantine duplicious strategy.

  9. @Yakub
    Russia doesn’t help itself at all manipulation of the contentions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, taking Armenia for granted selling lots of weapons to Azerbaijan to be used on Armenia. Having a tie in which prevented Armenia from buying weapons from NATO countries no such encumbrances on Azerbaijan allowing Armenia to fall behind to be savaged in 2020. Telling Armenia to withdraw from internationally recognised Azerbaijan yet would go on to invade Ukraine and seek annexations of its internationally recognised territory. The government might be Turkophile but the people are suspicious of the pop up excessively well staffed Turkish barbers and their drug money laundering and harassment of schoolgirls .
    Don’t hate Russia but the current reckonings should lead to a sober review of Russia and less infatuation and just be realistic and not carried away with idealistic wishful thinking which had been rife. Remember Turkey isn’t on Russia unfriendly countries list. It’s the infatuation with Russia led to much the current woes ignoring that Russia has been fast and loose with Armenia. Remember for Syria Assad was so pro Russian and now an exile and it’s nothing to do with Pashinyan!

  10. Yakub ask yourself why does Russia treat Armenia in such a derisory way and why under Putin and lavarov Russia relationship with most of the former soviet union has declined. Maybe it’s how they behave after all issues with other countries can’t be linked to Pashinyan etc. Armenia ultimately has to come to some arrangement with Turkey allowing the issues to fester for generations is allowing Russia to monopolise and abuse Armenia. This doesn’t mean that Turkey is in the right at all but they are a neighbour and one has to acknowledge reality.
    I’m not of the Slava Ukraine brigade either they are being played by the west and the Europe they believe they are fighting for doesn’t exist but that’s another story. Russia has treated Armenia rather badly taking advantage of the issues and due to the anger and trauma from Turkish activities has meant too much expedient generosity and not actually realising that just because Turkey and Azerbaijan are enemies doesn’t exactly mean that Russia is a friend . The UK state might have a bias towards Turkey “vital NATO ally” etc but it doesn’t mean the people do or because we have a monarchy doesn’t mean that people are always monarchists and so on.

  11. QUESTIONS:

    At present, know that Russia is unreliable (and if we’re honest, has always been so in various ways) and has snuggled up to Armenia’s sworn, genocidal enemies, Azerbaijan and Turkey.

    Recall too that Russia pushed the infamous Protocols of 2008 on Armenia.

    The West is unreliable too, and pro-Turkish, enabling pan-Turkism. That’s bad.

    Don’t pick one over the other.

    How to re-establish a respectful relationship with Russia?

    What can Armenia do to maneuver between Russia and the West?

    Assume that Pashinyan is not in power any longer.

  12. At the end of the day, let’s not forget that Mr. Pashinyan represents the democratic will of the Armenian people. Armenia is now a “Westernized” country with “European” aspirations, remember? So please show the duly-elected leader of Armenia some respect, as he is the Western-financed political activist a clear majority of our “people”, both in the homeland and in the diaspora, wanted to lead Armenia not only in 2018 but also in 2020, 2021 and 2023. So, if you naysayers believe in “democracy”, “Westernization” and “the American way”, stop your complaining and start supporting Mr. Pashinyan in his historic mission, a mission he was given a mandate for by the “people”…

    I would really like to see Russia cut-off all financial, economic and energy ties with Armenia and take its troops stationed on Armenia’s border with Turkey back to Russia. Sometimes you just have to let a terminally ill patient die…

Back to top button