Who remembers this phrase nowadays, “Armenia without Armenians,” or “Hayasdan arantz hayeroo”?
That was Ottoman policy — whether through forced conversions to Islam and subsequent Kurdification or Turkification, outright massacres, kidnapping of boys and girls or the creation of unbearable economic burdens by over-taxing Armenians and pillaging the settled population.
There’s a whole book that cites example after example of the Kurdification and Turkification, and that’s just pre-Genocide. That process is ongoing as demonstrated during the first decade of this century when crypto-Armenians started “coming out” in “modern” Turkey!
The massacre category obviously needs no further explanation. Neither does the kidnapping one. It’s obvious what happens to a three-year-old when taken from one home and raised in another.
The most devilish technique for de-Armenianizing the Armenian Highlands was the economic one. With the Ottoman Empire decaying and in desperate need of funds, a tax farming system was put in place. Anyone who could assemble the funds to buy the right to tax a certain geographic area paid the central government and was free to extort whatever he could from that area’s peasantry — again, most often the Armenians. This led to impoverishment, and families sent sons to remote cities to work as laborers (who became known as “bantoukhd”) and save their ancestral property from the greedy tax collectors. Couple the taxation with the losses to nomads empowered to steal livestock, grain or other reserves, and you can imagine the desperate conditions our ancestors found themselves in. Between the sons’ departures and the loss of home and hearth, there was a slow but steady outflow of Armenians from our homeland — just what the Ottoman authorities wanted.
Here it’s appropriate to share a story from Roupen Der Minassian’s memoirs. If memory serves, the year was 1905. The persecution and repression of Armenians was at an all-time high where Roupen and Kevork Chavoush operated. Something had to be done, so they hatched a plot and started a rumor that spread like wildfire. The story went, the Russians had promised land to any Armenian who made it to the border. People believed it, packed up their belongings and headed for the Russo-Turkish border. While de-Armenianization was the Turkish authorities’ aim, they couldn’t afford it to occur instantaneously, because the local economy would collapse without Armenians as its backbone. The pressure on Armenians was reduced and a respite secured for the people.
So far we’ve only covered Armenian extirpation from the western end of our country.
The process, or its attempts, were afoot on the eastern end, too. The 1905 Armeno-Tatar (as Azeris were called back then before the creation of the artifice now named Azerbaijan) clashes were an early indicator. Recall that some of the great pan-Turkists of the 19th and 20th centuries hailed from the territory now called Azerbaijan. In 1920, the Tatars committed the Shushi pogroms. With Sovietization and its attendant “brotherhood among peoples” came the extirpation of Armenians not only from the plains of Artsakh but also Nakhichevan. The Sumgait and Baku massacres of the 1980s-90s cleared the rest of the Azerbaijani SSR of Armenians. All that remained was towering Artsakh, and that thorn in Baku’s side was removed a little over a year ago.
Any fool can see the centuries-long de-Armenianization of our homeland at the hands of assorted Turkish (Azeris included) murderous leaders. International leaders must be called to account for overlooking and condoning this process.
But, more importantly, we must act. This is where the Roupen/Kevork example comes in. We need inspired, clever, powerful ideas for courses of action that can circumvent the power imbalance currently in place between Yerevan and the Diaspora on one side and Ankara and Baku on the other.
Do you have such an idea? Put it out for our nation to see.
Garen,
Turkish nationalist genocide deniers are thriving within 40 miles are less of Glendale and you are worried about things more than halfway across the world. Google “Farrah Khan Irvine Armenians”. Not one politician condemned her and the city council didn’t condemn her. Not even our journalists like Ellina Abovian (who covered Wild Rivers in Irvine instead) or Araksya Karapetyan reported on it or that the city pledged an area in the Great Park for the Armenian community to erect an Armenian Genocide memorial. Do we need more words or memorials? And can we stop seeking recognition of our Genocide and request awareness and celebration of our heritage? If we can be marginalized in Southern California with little or no blowback or media coverage, then what can you expect for us abroad.
I WHISHED ARTSAKH, to apply, to become part of Russian federation. Good for Artsakh population and good oppotunity for Russia to be established in southern Caucasus; strategically. Maybe its NOT too late! But to whom to suggest!
@Harout Torossian
Tragically, Artsakh is forever lost, just like Nakhichevan, with all Armenians expelled and all Armenian heritage destroyed, to be repopulated only by Azerbaijanis. Putin said that Artsakh was part of Azerbaijan. (Worse, Pashinyan said that Artsakh was part of Azerbaijan, after the disastrous Second Artsakh War. Before the war, before he made his U-turn, he said that “Artsakh is Armenia. That’s it.”) The blockade and the eventual conquest of Artsakh by Azerbaijan, as well as the ethnic cleansing of all Armenians, happened with the approval of Putin, in order to punish Pashinyan for his pro-Western orientation. The Russians said, “Why should we shed our blood for Artsakh?”. None of this could have happened without the approval of Putin, especially if Pashinyan had not shifted Armenia’s traditional pro-Russian foreign policy to the West which angered Russia, who in turn shifted its support to the equally authoritarian and anti-Western Azerbaijan. During the First Artsakh War, the exact opposite was the case, with an openly anti-Russian and pro-Western Azerbaijan and a pro-Russian Armenia, which was fully supported by Russia. So many opportunities were lost by Armenia, while it controlled Artsakh and had the upper hand, only for this to be squandered and eventually lost. Pashinyan and his predecessors share the blame for this debacle. Will Armenia, which has never been so weakened and exposed for a century like today, permanently lose territory to Azerbaijan (which already occupies 200 sqare kilometers of Armenia’s territory) under the disastrous leadership of Pashinyan?
I don’t think Azeris want to live there. I bet you most rational ones want out of Azerbaijan all together.