My Turn
Sassounian: Who Is Responsible for Turning Erdogan into a Fanatical Tyrant?
When the Justice and Development Party (AKP) came to power in 2002, its founder, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, appeared like a devout Muslim seeking to eliminate corruption and improve the standard of living of Turkish citizens.
During the last 13 years, Erdogan gradually turned into a corrupt despot, assuming the airs of a modern-day Ottoman Sultan. Was he a wolf in sheep’s clothing to start with, or was he spoiled by the international community’s blind support and lavish praise? Notably, Presid




“Was he a wolf in sheep’s clothing to start with, or was he spoiled by the international community’s blind support and lavish praise? ”
I think it’s easy to point the finger at Erdogan and claim he was always a wolf in sheep’s clothing. It’s also easy to blame the international community for their undying praise of a “moderate Islamist government.” The only people to take the blame is ourselves (Turks). We put him in power, we re-elect him, we reward his corruption and neo-Ottoman fantasies with votes.
We have no concept of democracy. Even during the secular past, we always dealt with left/right conflict with coups and military control rather than try and solve them through the democratic processes that existed. We don’t value democracy, we value power. We (“we” being the majority, not a blanket statement on Turks) don’t value LIBERAL democracy; we content ourselves with majoritarianism. No minority rights, no real religious freedom, no real freedom of expression attest to this. For a long time the majority, though fairly religious, bought into Kemalism through institutionalized validation of what Ataturk stood for. Now things have changed; now the majority support what Erdogan and AKP stand for in principle. Now the secular Kemalists are crying out, now they criticize the government and the issues of freedom that exist. I have zero sympathy for these so-called “progressives of Turkey.” The secular regimes were the ones that ruthlessly persecuted Kurds (“mountain Turks”), Alevis, Armenians, Greeks (1955 pogrom), Jews (Varlik Vergisi), and the more religious parts of our society (including the childish headscarf ban that lasted until 2010). Where was their concern for minority rights, religious rights, and freedom of expression then? Doesn’t matter when YOU aren’t the one being persecuted does it? Just look at Today’s Zaman. When Erdogan was buddies with Fetullah you couldn’t find an article that criticized AKP. Now that things have changed, the editor of TZ has the audacity to complain about freedom of speech when the newspaper magically seemed to go silent whenever a journalist would get imprisoned or threatened by AKP before the rift.
So to answer the question “who is responsible for turning Erdogan into a fanatical tyrant?”
80 years of alternating periods of sham and failed democracy. No respect for minority rights on either side of the political spectrum. The concept of a real democracy never taking hold in people’s minds. The never ending creation of in-groups and out-groups, where those with differing opinions (like me right now) are traitors to the state. We’re all to blame. Yes, Erdogan is a fanatical tyrant. But do we deserve any better? That should be the questions we ask ourselves.
You are totally right, over a period of time, in Turkey, we have elected parties and had a political system that lead to some guy like Erdogan to gain power. It is our responsibility that we have elected parties like the AKP in power, thanks to such things as CHP ruling for 2+ decades, numerous coups in 1960, 1971, 1980 and post-modern coups in 1993 and 1997, as well as attacks on Leftist Movements (which led to the PKK insurgency) and denying the rights for people to speak their language. We the Turkish people come in different ethnic groups and need to take pride into it. Also, we should protect Christians, Jews and other religions too. But, in order to have real rule of law restored in Turkey, we need to turn to our neighbor to the west (Greece) to seek inspiration. Let’s look at SYRIZA for instance.
Good analysis RVDV.
Interesting comment about TZ.
I have been reading TZ regularly and the change is very noticeable: before Erdogan crackdown and after.
Also interesting: the comments policy was changed drastically after the crackdown; became much more restrictive, and the volume of published comments went down drastically.
HDN went all out and stopped accepting comments altogether.
This is just a conjecture, but I sense both are terrified of authorities, in case the wrong word gets published, and their staff gets arrested for “insulting” someone or other in AKP.
RVDV,
Your critique of Turkish attempts at democracy are at both unique to Turkey and at the same time universal. It can be applied anywhere in this world. The democracy a country ends up with depends on what the people want out of their government and if they’re willing to speak up and hold it accountable. Even the most hard-lined leadership is sensitive about a disgruntled and dissatisfied public and they will try to respond to it even if in a half-hearted manner.
Turkey is in need of your awareness and take on democracy as you’ve expressed here.