DiasporaStatements

Catholicos Aram I says, “Stay away from nation-destroying attempts to divide the Church”

The following is a translation of a statement by Catholicos Aram I.

Stay away from nation-destroying attempts to divide the Church

Already a subscriber?Log in here

This story is FREE for you...

Create a free account to access this and four more articles, and get more sent to you with our e-newsletter.

Or, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.

His Holiness Catholicos Aram I

Born in 1947, in Beirut, Lebanon, His Holiness Catholicos Aram I of the Great House of Cilicia, studied at the Armenian Theological Seminary, Antelias, Lebanon and the Ecumenical Institute of Bossey, Geneva, Switzerland. He received his M.Div. from the Near East School of Theology, his S.T.M. jointly from the American University of Beirut and Near East School of Theology, and his PhD from Fordham University in New York. He also holds several honorary degrees. His major areas of specialization are philosophy, systematic theology, and Near Eastern church history. Catholicos Aram I was ordained as a celibate priest in 1968 and obtained the title of Vartabed (Doctor of the Armenian Church) in 1970. In 1979, after serving for one year as Locum Tenens, he was elected Primate of the Armenian Orthodox Community in Lebanon; the next year he received episcopal ordination. In June 1995, His Holiness was elected Catholicos (the Head of the Church) by the Electoral Assembly of the Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia.

3 Comments

  1. Your Holiness Aram I,

    I share your concern for the unity and vitality of Holy Etchmiadzin and the Armenian Apostolic Church. Yet, with equal reverence, I must respectfully challenge the assertion that reform and constructive engagement amount to “nation‑destroying attempts” or seeds of division.

    The strength of the Church has always rested not on silence, but on its ability to renew itself in the face of challenges. To equate reform with division risks discouraging the very dialogue that can heal wounds and restore trust.

    While the independence of the Church must be safeguarded, it is also a national institution with profound influence on public life. Engagement with state authorities, when conducted constitutionally and respectfully, is not interference but a safeguard against mistrust and stagnation.

    Support for the Catholicos of All Armenians is vital, but loyalty must coexist with accountability. To rally blindly around leadership without addressing legitimate grievances risks alienating the faithful. True devotion demands transparency and responsiveness.

    Alarmist warnings of “self‑destruction” or “nation‑destroying” inflame rather than calm. Reform does not destroy the Church; refusal to engage with legitimate concerns does. The language of fear should give way to the language of responsibility and renewal.

    The preservation of Holy Etchmiadzin – the Mother Church lies not in resisting reform, but in embracing it. Constructive criticism is not division — it is the path to unity, vitality, and trust.

  2. There is nothing legitimate about Traitor Nikol. His depravity is without bounds and his defenders are advancing foreign interests.

Back to top button