Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan met on June 19 with a group of Diaspora Armenians who worked as temporary staff members at various ministries in Armenia.
During his remarks to the group, the prime minister deviated from the subject matter and made senseless statements about the Diaspora. He said that “…in a large part of our history, during the history of the Third Republic, the Diaspora has often or sometimes been viewed as an auxiliary institution to the administration of the Republic of Armenia. The change that is occurring is as follows: we say that the Diaspora cannot be an auxiliary institution to the administration of the Republic of Armenia, because the Republic of Armenia, like any state, is an instrument with its clear mechanisms where it is very clearly described who and how is managing that mechanism. If there is no detail or larger whole in the architecture of that mechanism, we are trying to connect that whole to that mechanism; we are inhibiting the progress of that mechanism. This is obvious. And in this logic, I think that the change that is taking place is very important and very essential. But, on the other hand, I want to look at it with reverse logic as well. In many cases, the Republic of Armenia was also perceived as an auxiliary or non-auxiliary tool for the administration of the Diaspora. I want to say that, in my understanding, this also needs to end. Why? Because in case we make the Republic of Armenia an auxiliary or non-auxiliary tool, we are placing the Republic of Armenia outside the limits of its jurisdiction and, therefore, we make the Republic of Armenia more vulnerable. Our strategy, which I have talked about, the conceptual framework of ensuring the security of the Republic of Armenia, is legitimacy which is also related to this — that we can act only where we have jurisdiction and legitimacy to act. We cannot act where we don’t have jurisdiction and legitimacy to act as a state. And because of this circumstance, social-psychological changes will inevitably take place in Armenia-Diaspora relations as well. I described what should not be as we had pictured. I mean, I understand that there is a certain gap within what I said, but I am not ready today to even attempt to fill that gap because I don’t think that’s my job or at least only my job. That requires wider discussions, and there, the Republic of Armenia or officials of the Republic of Armenia can have a say, say something, but I think that these discussions are more public and informal level discussions about how should be the new relations between Armenia and the Diaspora. They are no longer like that and will not be like that. I think that is obvious…”
If you understand nothing from Pashinyan’s rambling words, you are not alone. The problem is that he always speaks without a prepared text causing him to stray from the subject and say things that he had not planned to say.
In his lengthy statement, Pashinyan tried to refute a thought that did not exist in anyone’s mind — that “the Diaspora is viewed as an auxiliary institution to the management of the Republic of Armenia.” No one had said that. We have always envisaged the Diaspora’s role as providing humanitarian aid, investments and professional expertise to the homeland.
On the positive side, I am glad Pashinyan acknowledged that Armenia has no jurisdiction to meddle in the internal affairs of the Diaspora. He has great difficulty managing the problems facing Armenia, let alone the issues of the Diaspora — something he knows nothing about.
Pashinyan then strayed into the subject of “how many Armenians are there in the world.” He said: “…There is another problem. We do not always attach big significance to arithmetic. Recently, a question arose in my head. We keep saying, ‘10 million Armenians, 10 million Armenians, 10 million Armenians.’ Is there a list of these Armenians somewhere or not? I am convinced that there isn’t. Here again is the phenomenon of sanctification. That number is sacred, do not touch it suddenly. It neither increases nor decreases. You cannot change it. It’s 10 million! If someone says that ‘it’s not 10 million, it’s 10,561,000,’ everyone will attack him and say, ‘ignorant, dilettante. How do you know that? Who counted it, etc.?’ If someone says: ‘no, it’s 9,200,000,’ they will say, ‘you scoundrel, you are belittling the global influence of Armenians. With the stroke of a pen, you wiped out 800,000 Armenians.’ This is our reality. This is about us, but we have to talk about it. If we don’t talk about it, what is the use?”
The prime minister is wrong that no one knows the number of Armenians in the world. He could have checked Wikipedia under the topic of “Armenian population by country,” which lists the approximate number of Armenians in each one of 107 countries. There are many other sources that give the number of Armenians in the world. Since no one has counted every single Armenian in the world, naturally, the 10 million is a rough estimate.
If this subject really interests the prime minister, he should direct his High Commissioner for Diaspora Affairs to conduct a worldwide survey and compile a more accurate number of Armenians in the world.
I also suggest that the prime minister’s aides write his speeches, so he can read from a written text and not stray into whatever comes to his head at the moment.
Harut Sassounian
Latest posts by Harut Sassounian (see all)
- Aliyev the wolf vs. Pashinyan the lamb: It is clear who will devour whom - January 14, 2025
- Lladro produces ‘Karabakh horse’ porcelain figurines as propaganda for Azerbaijan - January 7, 2025
- Letters by Armenian Genocide eyewitnesses should be published in several languages - December 31, 2024
Wikipedia (and other) estimates for the Armenian World Population, while legitimate, represent the rockbottom lowest possible number of Armenians worldwide.
We need look no further than American (US) Census estimates to see why: The US Census traditionally identifies Armenians as White. Because “White” bundles together multiple nationalities (including Armenians), many Armenians identify as White (in the US Census Questionnaire), instead of as Armenian. But, even those people see themselves as Diaspora Armenian Americans.
As a point of reference, I’m in the San Francisco Bay Area. About 25 years ago, I started using a double identity reference point. I checkmark the “White” Box, and also the “Other” Box. By the Other Box I write in “Armenian”. I’m sure that some Diaspora Armenians only identify themselves as “White” or “MENA”. Only my maternal ancestry is Armenian (ie, Half Armenian and Half Germanic), but my Armenian Heritage remains fundamental to my identity.
Many assimilated Half-Blood Armenian Americans are veiled and unseen can only be estimated, despite that their Armenian identity remains noteworthy. Many peripherally diaspora Armenians have been lost, because diaspora Armenian Communities failed dismally.
“… but my Armenian Heritage remains fundamental to my identity.”
Same here. I identify as Armenian American as well. A person doesn’t have to have an Armenian surname to be Armenian. In my case, my grandma married an American guy, but we didn’t adopt mainstream white American culture at all. My dad identified Armenian. After watching my dad suffer during my childhood, I completely spurn everything about white culture (esp. Conservative white evangelical Christian culture). I’ve had to explain to both white and black Americans that Armenian culture is very different than what is accepted as American white culture. For one, I enjoy the fact of having a very personal family connection to Biblical history.
Mr. Nikol Pashinyan would do well to never ever question an American’s chosen identification. If he ever questioned my Armenian background, I’ll be quoting the last part of Isaiah 54:17 in his face, “… every tongue that lies about me will be shown to be in the wrong…” Jesus will prove my Armenian-ness to him and to anyone else who questions me.
Why is the total number so important all of a sudden? What is the total number of Russians in the world, do we know? I don’t. Anyway, since when is wikipedia a source of wisdom.
The Photo of the above article tells everything about PM Nicole Pashinyan and his supporters as follow.
1-the PM Nicole is seating at the center of his supporters/followers as the Chief of the Tribe to convey and impose his orders.
2-The seating arrangement of the followers are to listen Chief Nicole only, because they are not seating around round table to interact with each other.
3-it is obvious that PM Nikole has no subject to discuss and argue other than to impose on his followers/Ministers, Armenian people and Armenia HIS OPINIONS and his foreign contributors’ ‘advises’ as the above Article is proofing.
In conclusion: The Ministers/parliamentarians must tap on PM Nikole shoulder and tell him that his time is up and to start new approach with real democratic process for the sake of all Armenians and Armenia because PM Nicole’s approach is self destructing in many ways.