When a wild animal senses a wounded victim, there is no pacifying their appetite. While Armenia continues to double down on its concessions of accepting Azerbaijani territorial integrity that includes Artsakh, the Azeri response this week is hardly optimistic. Dictator Aliyev, who has committed war crimes and ignored the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling on Berdzor (Lachin), arrogantly declared that he will not negotiate with Artsakh. He said that the Armenians must accept Azerbaijani rule or leave and demanded a corridor through sovereign RoA territory (so-called Zangezur). He openly displays disdain for all Armenians, particularly those that he claims are his citizens in Artsakh.
The West, obsessed with beating the Russians to the punch, continues to offer empty words that overstate the prospects of a peace agreement. Russia is only concerned with maintaining control in the South Caucasus and will turn on Armenia in a moment to serve that objective. Agreements, such as the lauded and often referenced November 2020 trilateral agreement after the war, mean nothing as Russia and Azerbaijan violate its content on a daily basis. Sadly, Armenia continues to point out the violations with a victim mentality. Azerbaijan taunts Armenia with brazen comments such as last week’s threat that it can carry out any military operations against Artsakh. Aliyev further demanded the resignation of the Artsakh government and the dissolution of the parliament. Even a casual observer would conclude that any “peace” agreement in this environment would be absurd. Azerbaijan is so confident in its position that it openly threatens military actions if its demands are not met. Why not? It’s not as though following rules and abiding by agreements got them here. It has been quite the opposite. They have violated every agreement and continuously committed acts of aggression.
Already a subscriber?Log in here
This story is FREE for you...
Create a free account to access this and four more articles, and get more sent to you with our e-newsletter.By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.
I have increasingly become disenchanted with Pashinyan’s dealings with Azerbaijan. Based on what we read, it seems that the following happened during the 44 day war and the past two and half years.
1) Pashinyan had no military experience and was overwhelmed by the Azeri attack. He panicked instead of rallying the people and mobilizing. Pashinyan is no Zelensky. He had to rely on the generals which he did not trust. Of course the Armenian military leadership did not help the situation with their own incompetence and corruption; the Russian army debacle in Ukraine shows how badly military reforms are needed. The lack of military preparation was partly his fault but also that of former president Sargsyan.
2) he has consistently lied to his people about how bad the situation is in Artsakh and Armenia. Instead he makes secret deals( or is coerced by Russia/Azerbaijan) and then announces them drip by drip. Examples include ceding the Goris Kapan highway and Berdzor, the closing of the Lachin highway /installation of Azeri checkpoint, the recognition of Azerbaijan with Artsakh in it, the ceding of enclaves in Armenia proper and so on. Pashinyan seems to be out of his depth being constantly outmaneuvered by Aliyev and Putin. Amazingly he never accepts responsibility for minor or major issues that afflict his government; for example his speeding motorcade killed a pregnant woman, or the fact that his government could not resist the invasion of Armenia proper in 2022 resulting in the death of 200 soldiers; or that there are more than 100 POW in Baku with two more kidnapped last week. It is correct to say that the Nov 10th 2020 trilateral agreement has been thoroughly shredded. What makes anyone think that any “peace” agreement will not have a similar fate?
3) His vision is an Armenia economically and militarily connected to the West, free from the Russian orbit. For that he is willing to sacrifice Artsakh, memory of Ararat and Western Armenia, Tsiternakaberd and Diaspora. He imagines an Armenia without a history living in peace with Turkey. But that Disneyland fantasy does not exist in the South Caucasus. Turkey has shown no sign of real reproachment; Cavusoglu recently said that Armenian genocide was a fiction and no country including the US reprimanded him.
4) Pashinyan is the favorite leader of US, EU and even Azerbaijan because he is not defending his people but serving the interests of foreigners. He may even get invited to the White House after he signs a peace agreement. Pashinyan should resign, just as Neville Chamberlain did, and let a leader with military experience and backbone take over. Hopefully that leader will be a true patriot and not just a Russian lackey nor some corrupt oligarch
The bigest problem of Armenia is that they have very little to offer to superpowers, and they keep misreading international Geostrategy priorities, as usual Armenians act like they coudn’t understand that the corrupt world functions with bribes and interests, and most countries rights are overrided by powerfuls interests, remeber: MIGHT is RIGHT
I have to agree with you whole-heartedly. The international community watches as Armenia/Artsakh get bullied to the point of genocide by the brutal dictator Aliyev and complicit Turkey. Armenians are being squeezed into a corner and the only way out is to fight. And it seems that the inevitable outcome of this could very well be regional war from Turkey to Iran and southward to the entire Middle East.
You are not correct, Raffi.
Armenia has much to offer and is highly prized.
Without Armenia, Russia loses the entire Caucasus.
WITH Armenia, the West (along with Georgia and Azerbaijan) wins the entire Caucasus.
This is why Armenia is being fought over. This is why Russia is so angry at Armenia and why Russia is holding Artsakh hostage.
Armenia represents the tipping point for Russia vs. the West.
Russia’s only foothold in the Caucasus is Armenian land. Without that, Russia has no foothold.
This is elementary geography and geopolitics.
Do Georgia and Azerbaijan want to be under Russia’s boot? No they do not.
His entire life, Nikol dreamed of abandoning Artsakh, forgetting about the Armenian Genocide, unconditionally opening Armenia’s borders with Azerbaijan and Turkey and, last but not least, bring Armenia out of Russia’s orbit his entire life. This naturally did not escape the attention of foreign intelligence services. Western and Turkish interests therefore placed Nikol into power in 2018 exactly for this purpose. To it’s utter disgrace, the Armenian world, both native and diasporan, preferred to keep Nikol in power not once, but twice. That’s when Russia, having had enough of Armenian duplicity and incompetence, pulled its protective hand away just slightly. Moscow would use the opportunity to punish Armenians by collaboratong with Turks. The rest is history, as they say. All in all, the tragedy of the last 5 years in Armenia was the by-product of westernization, democracy and the self-destructive efforts of Armenians, both native and diasporan, to use the West as a hedge against Russia. Armenians maneuvered Armenia into today’s dead end. Armenians have no right to complain today, as they were the main authors of the country’s latest tragedy…
Yes, Russia has betrayed Armenia and is holding Artsakh hostage.
Yes, Pashinyan is terrible, but history also says that Russia gives away Armenian land and betrays Armenians.
Just because the West is bad does not make Russia good. That would be illogical.
And may I say that all Armenian governments since 1991 have been corrupt, stolen from the people, and played with the West in all sorts of ways.
No Armenian government has reached out to the Diaspora with sincerity.
The Diaspora has had to force its way in.
This is a pretty good article.
But it says that “Russia is only concerned with maintaining control in the South Caucasus and will turn on Armenia in a moment to serve that objective.”
Russia has <> turned on Armenia, as witness the 2020 war, the blockade of Artsakh that Russia is supporting, and Russia’s not doing anything about the Azeri incursions into Armenia.
Also, the article says “Sadly, Armenia continues to point out the violations with a victim mentality.”
I don’t think pointing out Azerbaijan’s many sins is being a “victim.”
In fact, the article later admits that “Armenia may have an opportunity to reset the parameters with Azerbaijan rejecting everything. Armenia needs to position them as the BAD GUYS in a process that at least three outside parties are invested in.”
I do not understand.
The author says criticizing Azerbaijan is like acting as a victim.
Then the author says Armenia should criticize Azerbaijan.
Which is it?