OpinionOp-Eds

Silence is complicity: Who will protect the sanctuaries of Artsakh?

The catastrophic 44-day war of 2020 and the subsequent 10-month blockade of Artsakh, culminating in the forced displacement and ethnic cleansing of its population in September 2023, stand as one of the most painful humanitarian crises of the 21st century. Yet, this tragedy did not end with the physical removal of the indigenous population from their ancestral lands. Today, Artsakh is undergoing a second phase of this process: cultural genocide. This is a state-sponsored policy aimed at erasing t

Already a subscriber?Log in here

This story is FREE for you...

Create a free account to access this and four more articles, and get more sent to you with our e-newsletter.

Or, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.

Armik Grigoryan

Armik Grigoryan is a freelance journalist from Yerevan. She studied at the Department of Journalism at the Armenian State Pedagogical University. Grigoryan has deepened her knowledge through various educational programs, including a three-month course at Factor TV. She has also participated in more than 10 professional training sessions and completed internships at leading TV stations in Armenia. Currently, she works in TV. Grigoryan enjoys writing about social issues, human rights, culture and arts, as well as tourism.

One Comment

  1. For those three “symbols”, they were symbols of the lack of protection of Artsakh’s monuments even before they fell into Azeri hands. The medieval gateway to Dadivank was destroyed and rebuilt new in the months immediately before the 2020 war. This was at the end of multiple years’ worth of destructive heavy-handed “restorations” that had left Dadivank almost devoid of historical integrity. Drone views of Amaras taken during the war revealed stacks of machine-cut paving slabs intended to entirely cover over the grassed (and always grassed) courtyard space, and the original flat earthen roofs of Amaras’s courtyard cells were in the process of being destroyed to be replaced by pitched tiled roofs. The bottom-left corner of your Gandzasar photo shows machine-cut marble stone cladding in the process of being added to cover over 17th century wall surfaces; the top of the same enclosure wall already has a capping of historically inaccurate tiles. Sometime before this, there was the inexplicable destruction of the little pitched-roof mini “chapels” that were perched on top of the north-east and north-west corners of Gandzasar’s 13thC gavit. The one at the NE corner was rebuilt orientated EW rather than the original NE orientation; the one at the NW corner was rebuilt missing the model church that once stood at the apex of its roof.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Back to top button