The Armenian Weekly turns the page

This is the final print edition of The Armenian Weekly.
Six months ago, I wrote my first editorial. I noted, perhaps superstitiously, that the Weekly had lasted 91 years—the same age as my grandfather when he passed. It struck me less as coincidence and more as inheritance—a sign that some things, like memory, don’t end. They simply change form.
This paper has never just been a record. It has been a relay, a stitched seam between homeland and diaspora, between silence and articulation, between fracture and belonging.
And it has been deeply personal.
I began 2025 preparing to publish my first issue on New Year’s Day. I found myself—like so many editors before me—pulled into the archives. I came across a 1979 special issue of the Armenian Review, dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the Hairenik. The issue reprinted coverage from the Hairenik’s early years. One photo stopped me cold: a group of Sassountsis in 1912.
What I hadn’t known is that the Armenian-American community—newly arrived, mostly laborers, many undocumented—had mobilized around the crisis in Sassoun. They raised the equivalent of nearly $400,000 in today’s money. Many returned to fight—some died. And the Hairenik chronicled it all, with names, appeals and urgency.
1912 was also the year my ancestors fled Sassoun for what would become Soviet Armenia. I couldn’t help but wonder: did the support raised here help them survive? Now, 113 years later, here I was, publishing a paper now that may have saved their lives then.
These aren’t just full-circle moments. They’re proof that we are our own continuity.
Over the century, this paper has reached kitchens and coffee tables from Watertown to Fresno, Hartford to Detroit—often even crossing these shores. People saw their wedding announcements here, their children’s names in graduation lists, their poems, their protests, their grief. Sometimes the paper offered answers, but more often, it offered something else: recognition—the knowledge that someone, somewhere, was paying attention.
This is what the Hairenik and the Weekly have always done: smuggled the unspeakable across borders, translated the invisible, and archived what regimes wanted us to forget. They carried news when the wires were silent and offered continuity when Armenia felt like a ghost.
Armenians have lived history through denial, silence, censorship and rupture, but the Hairenik and the Weekly refused to be quiet. They printed through it all. When there was no homeland to return to, the paper became the homeland, a temporary republic of memory.
And now, we arrive at another rupture.
Artsakh is gone. Iran is under fire. Russia has withdrawn. Turkey waits. Azerbaijan circles. And Armenia’s government—inept at best, authoritarian at worst—picks fights with everyone but the fascists surrounding us. They cut down the trees of a smog-strangled Yerevan and call it development. They arrest journalists, muzzle opposition, slash social programs, undermine the Church, alienate the diaspora, and ignore the refugees and survivors of the war they lost.
There is a war within a war within a war. And if it is not external, it is internal. In a time like this, a free and persistent press matters more than ever.
With print subscriptions now reaching fewer than 1 in 5 readers—a number that continues to fall—we’re redirecting resources to where our community lives: online.
The demand for our reporting has never been greater. That’s why we’re embracing our digital future—not as a retreat, but as an expansion. Digitally, we’ll move faster, reach farther, archive in real time, invite new voices, and be read across continents at once.
The Weekly isn’t vanishing; it’s evolving to meet this moment.
A full era has committed itself to the archive. Now a new one opens—faster, borderless, and still just as stubborn in its service to truth.
As we transition to digital-first reporting—while continuing special print magazine issues for milestone moments—the archives become our bedrock. While print’s regular rhythm may end, its soul continues through special issue magazines—more frequent and ambitious than ever.
And in the meantime, the Hairenik Digital Archives has preserved every page since the very beginning, safeguarding paper in a communal memory bank. If you haven’t already, subscribe today—because preserving our past and reporting our present shouldn’t hinge on paper’s fragile economics but on our collective will to remember.
From the folded page to the open tab. From the inked column to the living scroll.
Through this transition, we gain immediacy, longevity and accessibility. We enter an age when the news doesn’t wait a week—it finds you.
The paper has always been a lifeline. Now, it becomes a constellation.
Someday, someone will scroll through the digital archives. They’ll find the Sassoun issue, the news of Talaat Pasha’s assassination, the announcements of the First Republic and the collapse of the Iron Curtain.
Through it all, the paper adapts and expands. We write forward, in whatever the medium.
And, as our Weekly team says to each other at the end of each phone call, I’ll see you online.
Remarkable analysis on such a touchy subject. Well said Lilly!
I started reading the editor’s reflection at this junction of the history of this historic newspaper. I expected it to be sentimental at and yes, it started that way, expectedly so. But a few paragraphs later came the blow that shook me to my core.
– The Armenian government the Armenian citizens have elected is “inept at best”, a judgment she renders at will.
– The Armenian government is “Autoreactive at worst” obviously the editor does not does not know what transpired in Armenia, under the watch of the presidents. She should have been aware at least of the October 27 killing (in 1999), that decapitated Armenia’s leadership and the March 1, 2008 killing of 10 protesting citizens. There is a whole list.
– The Armenian government “picks fights with everyone but the fascist urrounding us”. I guess the editor expects Armenia to pick a fight with fascist Turkey, and/or Azerbaijan instead of crossroad for peace Armenia’s initiative
Quoting the sentence: “Armenia’s government—inept at best, authoritarian at worst—picks fights with everyone but the fascists surrounding us.” It does end with that sentence.
I simply could not go on reading. I also cannot excuse her for her deliberate inflammatory statement as Hairenik turns a page.