ColumnsTashjian's Take

One Year After the Beirut Blast

On August 4, 2020 at around 6PM local time, a huge chemical explosion shook Beirut and its surrounding cities. The Port of Beirut was no more. But the destruction was not limited to the Port; the areas surrounding the explosion site along the famous cosmopolitan Armenia Street, populated by Armenians and other Christians sects, fr

Already a subscriber?Log in here

This story is FREE for you...

Create a free account to access this and four more articles, and get more sent to you with our e-newsletter.

Or, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.

Yeghia Tashjian

Yeghia Tashjian is the Issam Fares Institute Public Policy and International Affairs-American University of Beirut’s Regional and International Affairs Cluster Coordinator. He holds a master’s degree in Public Policy and International Affairs from the American University of Beirut and completed the "Strategic Leadership in Global Societal Security Program" at the Swedish Defense University in 2022. He earned his bachelor’s degree in political science from Haigazian University in 2013 and has worked in the university's Armenian Diaspora Research Center between 2016-2017. Yeghia's master’s thesis focused on China's geopolitical and energy security interests in Iran and the Persian Gulf. Currently, Tashjian is engaged in research on the phenomenon of Turkish-Russian 'co-opetition' in the MENA+ Caucasus region and Russia's involvement in the International North-South Transport Corridor. He contributes to various local and regional newspapers, has presented various topics from minority rights to regional security issues, and is a part-time instructor in the Department of Political Studies and Public Administration at the American University of Beirut.

3 Comments

  1. The Lebanese Army is still in one piece, though weak and useless in protecting Lebanon against Iran and ‘Hezbollah. However it is organized and could interface with the Israeli military, to transfer to hard hit communities very much needed help. I am confident the Israelis would assist.

  2. A heart-wrenching, superbly presented cri de coeur. Viva Lebanon and all of its various sectors and population centers. I wish I could provide some — any measure — of succor. I did notice “China” above…I have a dream that China might invest (further) in the Middle East, especially at this point toward assisting and rebuilding Lebanon, and around the world and provide further evidence of its burgeoning power and good works…that, IMO, far exceed the belligerence and “military option” and “no diplomacy” stances of my United States of America.
    Viva al-Lubnaan! — its people, its land, its future!

  3. I have noticed that most or almost all reports on Lebanon’s plight in the international media avoid mentioning the elephant in the room, the direct culprit in last year’s port explosion. That is Hizbullah. The Americans and French must know who is the direct culprit. But they will not blame the Hizb. And for that reason, all of Macron’s ostensibly helpful plans and suggestions are worthless. He wants the political class to make reforms, to take action to do this or that. But the Hizb holds a pistol to everyone’s head who might threaten their chokehold on the country. Yet Macron talks his silly gab as if Lebanon could pull itself out of the Hizb’s bear hug or chokehold all by itself. Western press commentators point to the confessional as the big problem to be gotten out of the way. But the Hizb would not allow that unless it could retain its control. Aoun too knows what his limits are. Last year, after the blast, he must have thought that he could do something to improve the economy while the Hizb seemed to be disoriented. His daughter spoke of some kind of modus vivendi with Israel. He himself agreed with US diplomats to try to reach an accord with Israel on a maritime border so that Lebanon could lease offshore zones for oil and gas drilling, and thus get payments and a cash flow from oil & gas companies. Unfortunately, the Hizb soon shot down the ensuing negotiations. But will Paris or Washington ever acknowledge the truth that the Hizb is an obstacle to Lebanon’s recovery? And then take appropriate actions?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Back to top button