Latest:

Vanadzin: Foxman Remarks at Suffolk Not Substitute for Formal Statement

Special for the Armenian Weekly

Abraham Foxman’s weekend address at the Suffolk Law School commencement was the subject of considerable controversy for the month leading up to his speech on Saturday. Campaigns were initiated by the National Lawyer’s Guild at Suffolk University as well as by the Armenian Museum of America to urge the University to reconsider its choice of speaker, citing Foxman’s controversial views on the Armenian genocide as well as on the rights of Muslims in America. Foxman, who is outgoing director of the Anti-Defamation League, has come under fire for his organization’s lobbying on behalf of the Turkish government against official recognition of the Armenian genocide on the part of the U.S., as well as the ADL’s series of vague, legalistic statements that attempt to sidestep classifying the Armenian genocide as such.

A fleeting reference in a commencement address is no substitute for a formal and unambiguous statement issued by the ADL, which itself would be meaningless unless combined with the absolute cessation of the ADL’s insidious pro-Turkish lobbying.

Suffolk University was roundly criticized in recent weeks for its choice of commencement speaker. The president of the Suffolk University chapter of the National Lawyer’s Guild, Amy Willis, was quoted in The Boston Globe saying, “Suffolk claims to embody diversity and be a place for all people, but this clearly is a speaker who does not embody those values.” Other sources went further; the blog Mondoweiss honed in on the issue of genocide denial with excerpts from National Lawyer’s Guild director Heidi Boghosian’s interview on Law & Disorder radio in April. The show’s co-host, Michael Smith, brought the issue into sharp relief:

The Jewish establishment personified by Abraham Foxman denies [the Armenian genocide]– why? Because in their ideology the Jewish genocide which followed the Armenian genocide has to be unique. Jews are the really sole victims. And they think if the Armenian genocide is recognized it will somehow undercut their moral authority in advocating for Jews and more broadly for the whole project of the Jewish settlement and colonization of Palestine, its displacement of the native Palestinians there and its ongoing oppression, really apartheid, in Palestine. Foxman is the leading voice in America for labelling people who criticize Israel as anti-Semites and if you’re Jewish like I am, and you criticize Israel, then you’re a self-hating Jew.

A Boston Globe op-ed titled, “Commencement Speakers: The good, the ‘meh’, and the ugly” by Suffolk University alum Alex Pearlman placed Foxman squarely in the “ugly” category:

Refusing to recognize the Armenian genocide while being a Holocaust survivor is just bad etiquette, not to mention Foxman’s controversial comments about the World Trade Center “mosque.” The Anti-Defamation League is also an organization that continues to conflate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism, a position that prohibits constructive debate about a two-state solution by shielding the Israeli government from criticism of their actions in an occupied Palestine. The Suffolk administration’s choice is a divisive one for the campus, which has both strong Armenian and Muslim populations, and has made commencement something to fight over instead of something to celebrate in unity. As a Suffolk alumna, I think this is a terrible choice.

Protesters outside the Wang Theater in Boston, where the commencement address was held, took a similar view. The small group, composed of Armenian and Jewish members of the community, distributed over 1,000 flyers to graduates and attendees detailing Foxman’s hypocrisy on the Armenian genocide issue. The flyers offered an in-depth explanation of the history of the conflict between the ADL and genocide scholars, as well as outlining the ADL’s series of disingenuous statements on the Armenian genocide, particularly in 2007 and 2008, which are still a subject of controversy today.

Much has been made of Foxman’s calculated mention of the Armenian genocide in his Suffolk address, which reeked of insincerity. A fleeting reference in a commencement address is no substitute for a formal and unambiguous statement issued by the ADL, which itself would be meaningless unless combined with the absolute cessation of the ADL’s insidious pro-Turkish lobbying.

After all, Foxman has shown himself capable of being quite frank when he wants to be. When asked in a 2007 interview with JTA if he had “done anything wrong” by engaging in a concerted effort against the recognition of a genocide, Foxman said, “It was also very clear to me that after the United States, the most important ally Israel has is Turkey. It’s a country that not only has promised to provide Israel with water until moshiach comes, but it’s a country that permits Israel’s pilots to do maneuvers over its land. And so, to me, it was very clear that there are two moral issues, but one trumps the other.” That is, his issue trumps the Armenians’.

The Boston Globe published an op-ed from Foxman on May 20, in which he discussed his choice to speak at Suffolk and how, ultimately, it was about promoting the ideals of open and free debate. Self-righteous and indignant, he lamented that disagreement with his policy approaches, “…stifles conversation, it is exactly the opposite of respect for freedom of expression that so many claim to be behind, and which inevitably leads to a purist approach, which rejects compromise as giving up one’s principles.”

These are lofty and rather surprising ideals coming from someone who has worked tirelessly to enforce Turkey’s gag rule on discussion of the Armenian genocide in the US. The ADL’s feeble argument against official US recognition of the Armenian genocide has been that it would be “counterproductive” to reconciliation efforts between Armenia and Turkey. By that logic, the reparations paid by Germany after World War II were surely counterproductive as well (an argument that I, as the granddaughter of a recipient of these reparations, would never make). If reconciliation is the sole and ultimate aim in any geopolitical conflict, then the establishment of Israel could be seen to be extremely “counterproductive.” Of course, this argument is fatuous because reconciliation cannot occur when an issue is stripped of its historical context, and reconciliation for its own sake is a worthless goal.

So it would seem that Foxman is for freedom of expression, as long as it is not in opposition to his views, which “stifles conversation.” Foxman is for reconciliation without counterproductive, pesky facts getting in the way, as long as the issue is not one in which he feels he holds a stake. It’s no wonder that Foxman is retiring in 2015; this kind of tap dance is a young man’s game.

11 Comments on Vanadzin: Foxman Remarks at Suffolk Not Substitute for Formal Statement

  1. Thank you, Katie Van Adzin, for this brilliant analysis.

    Foxman retires in the summer of 2015 — is that so he can do just a bit more damage before the centennial of the Genocide?

    Your presentation above is evidence enough that we must keep our eyes wide open and persist in the justice struggle that must happen beyond Suffolk’s commencement speech.

  2. avatar vart adjemian // May 28, 2014 at 10:54 am // Reply

    Very well said and articulated. I totally agree with her comments .
    It is painfully obvious that the Jewish lobbies worldwide and the Israeli government want to keep the Holocaust on the forefront; be the only race that suffered a calamity, and avoid any kind of comparison/ competition from the Genocide. They are concerned that if the Genocide is recognized, the Holocaust will lose its weight and significance. This is an absurd and irrational thinking because we have never denied or questioned the Holocaust.
    There are also geo-political reasons which are influencing the Israelis and the Israeli government. Within the Arab and Muslim world, Turkey is the only “ally” Israel has. This is a dangerous misconception.
    Turkey, being a member of NATO is being pressured to support Israel, and Israel because of its reliance on the US, is being pressured to support Turkey. Turkey cannot afford to lose the financial benefits the 24 NATO bases contribute to its economy. Thus there is a vicious triangle;
    NATO, US government, Israel. They are interconnected. I am sure eventually it is going to blow up because fundamentally it is flawed,
    immoral and dishonest .
    Vart Adjemian

  3. A brilliant and multi-layered in depth article covering all the issues. The spark that David Boyajian started on this issue way back in 2007 has turned into a storm that will hopefully soon sweep away the genocide deniers in to oblivion well before they can cause more damage in Washington.

  4. Foxman could not care less about Armenians and their genocide. He also does not care about any genocide except the Holocaust or any people except Jews. He is a total phony. I do not accept anything he or the ADL says, and I do not believe for one moment that the ADL is a real “human rights” organization. That human rights stuff is just a cover. The ADL is a Jewish organization for Jews and only for Jews, and that’s all it has ever been. End of story.

  5. avatar Audrey Kalajian // May 29, 2014 at 4:12 pm // Reply

    thank you for a brilliant analysis/article.

  6. Foxman like Lantos before him does as the Lobby says to do. Both turned about face when Israel Turkey relations soured.

    On a deeper level, we cannot expect anyone to favor truth over national survival. Foxman’s quote about Israeli access to water and airspace says as much.

    If Armenia’s survival depended upon Russia, it probably will not antagonize her and defend the Ukrainians who have some valid complaints against Russia or her proxies. For the same reason our political Diaspira groups will not be marching with the Ukrainans who may validly claim genocide by Stalin.

    I think the moral blame n Foxman and his ilk is a bit mitigated by their allegiance to Israel, itself a post genocidal community ( which yes, oppresses Arabs and Armenians). Far greater is the moral blame on nations who do not need Turkey, such as the US and worst of all, the UK.

  7. avatar Garo Yeghichian // May 30, 2014 at 4:09 am // Reply

    The ADL and Mr. Foxman they did shaw there true colour on the past.At the present, still you can`t trust them and personly I will never trust them.

  8. To JDA:
    The Armenian genocide was never a do-or-die issue for Israel or the Jewish lobby. They supported Turkey in this because they lack principle and only care about themselves. It was not necessary for either Israel or the Jewish lobby to do Turkey’s dirty work. They could easily have refused.

    Also, Armenians in general do recognize the Ukrainian genocide committed under Stalin. We are certainly not genocide deniers in that regard. Armenians are anti-Communist, more so than most people and countries.

    Please do not give Foxman or the ADL any credit or consideration. They claim to be for human rights for ALL people. They are not at all. They lie. They are just a Jewish political group that tries to put on a good front with touchy-feely “human rights” talk to fool non-Jews. Foxman is nothing but a rampaging bull elephant. The entire leadership of the ADL is corrupt.

  9. JDA, please see my reply to you under the other article on this topic, where I erroneously posted it:

    http://armenianweekly.com/2014/05/28/adls-abraham-foxman-recognizes-armenian-genocide/

  10. I read and appreciate your posts. I’m saying only that Foxman’s denial in his view protects Israel, and is therefore less immoral than the stand of UK and US.

  11. Oops!

    Israel does not care about Jews who stay in Turkey. Bit I doubt Foxman is proud now of the help he gave Turkey. By immunizing Turkey from AG recognition, he helped expose Turkish Jews to the same genocidal racism Armenians suffer every day:

    http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/The-silence-of-Turkish-Jewry-370808

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*