Latest:

Ruben Vardanyan: ‘We Won’t Get a Second Chance’

YEREVAN (Mediamax)—Below is a recent interview with entrepreneur, philanthropist, and co-founder of the IDeA Foundation—an organization committed to supporting long-term projects for Armenia’s development—Ruben Vardanyan.

Ruben Vardanyan (Photo: 100 Lives)

Among other important issues, Vardanyan spoke about the need to support the newly appointed Armenian government and the need for the Armenian people to contribute to Armenian authorities intellectually, financially, and organizationally, in order for the government’s new program to be put into action.

“We think that there is no alternative to the support for the Prime Minister and his team; we won’t get a second chance. After the approval of the new program, the government needs to put its plans into action immediately, and we are ready to contribute to this with our intellectual, financial, organizational and human resources, being completely aware of the fact that the program is still aimed at solving short-term problems and cannot reflect the full scope of the systematic changes required,” Vardanyan said during the interview.

The interview was conducted by Armenia-based news service Mediamax’s Ara Tadevosyan.

***

Mediamax: We survived two big crises in 2016: a war in the spring and a standoff at a police station in the summer. In your opinion, have the authorities and the public come to any serious conclusions? Maybe there is an understanding that something needs to be changed, but there is no practical will or resolution to do anything?

Ruben Vardanyan: I believe many people understand what happened, including Armenia’s leadership. However, there are various ways out of the current situation, and the main question is how ready is our society for change? I think that the April war and July events in Yerevan served as a wake-up call not only for the authorities, but also for Armenian society—both within the country and the diaspora. Profound changes are possible when there is an internal consensus in society, but it’s not clear that there is one right now.

We approached the 25th anniversary of Armenia’s independence in a situation where the country’s model of management, built during this period, has exhausted itself.

 

M.M.: Could you describe what you mean by that model?

R.V.: After the collapse of the USSR, the power in Armenia was taken by people born and raised in the Soviet system, or former dissidents, former Komsomol or Communist Party staff, former employees of special services. Many of them did and do love Armenia, however having no other experience in management but the one they witnessed in the Soviet Union, and having no opportunities to study in other countries, they recreated the management model that was the most comprehensible and familiar to them.

They think tactically, not strategically. Many of them believe that abusing their position of power to earn money is just normal behavior, not corruption. Those who can speak more languages, who are more cultured and better educated are left on the sidelines and unable to achieve any real success, because the dominant model in society is that of semi-criminal machismo. In such an environment cultured and smart people have nothing else left to do but express their disagreement with words, not deeds.

In this model the leaders of the Armenian state don’t see themselves as leaders of the Armenian nation, which entails a clear distinction between Armenia as a country and a nation living all over the world. A part of the elite welcomes the diaspora’s assistance programs, accompanying it with, “We are happy to see you in Armenia, it’s beautiful and safe here, but don’t interfere with what we believe we should do, as there is much you don’t understand.”

This model is built on the system of a closed society, and unfortunately, within it added value is formed not by the manufacture of new products or provision of services, but by the redistribution of resources – monopolization of imports, non-payment of customs fees, “appropriation” of assistance from international organizations, etc.

A lot of businessmen in Armenia got rich not because of their effective business management, but due to special preferences, tax evasion or manufacturing counterfeit or sub-standard products. This is not just about the oligarchs. Not a single one of the Armenian dairy products from 26 samples, which recently underwent independent testing, complied with standards, and this illustrates that in this model the health of our nation and our children is being sacrificed for the pursuit of “easy” money. The same goes for other products, and not all of them are produced by oligarchic structures, which is evidence of a serious problem and the general attitude to it.

An equally hot topic is house building standards, seismic safety norms in particular, which could potentially result in a huge number of casualties if a new earthquake hits the country. Today even new high-rise buildings in Yerevan get additional floors without any additional consideration of the increase of load on the supporting structures.

The absence of competition with the outside world has led to a situation where we have only a handful of organizations in Armenia, which comply with high international standards. The closed nature of the model has a negative impact on society as a whole, evident in many sectors—journalism, science, culture.

Our country has simply lowered its standards, and what used to be unacceptable seems quite normal now. We can and should change this situation by creating lots of large-scale and long-term educational projects at an international level. Projects like these would help solve another significant task—they facilitate change of the education system, which is outdated not only in Armenia, but in the rest of the whole world as well.

 

M.M.: You mentioned internal consensus. This doesn’t appear out of thin air. There has to be an agenda for the consensus to form around. Who should create the agenda in this fundamentally flawed model? The leadership hasn’t managed to do it using a “top-down” approach, but the opposite “bottom-up” method doesn’t work either.

R.V.: First, the existing model is not fundamentally flawed, it’s actually quite viable. Any model has advantages and disadvantages, and the current one has allowed us to avoid some of the more significant problems in the past that affected the former Soviet republics. However, it has exhausted itself, primarily economically.

In theory, this model can continue existing with new, artificial financial flows inwards. In any case it should be clear that within this model we are unable to strengthen our defense and tackle new challenges, realize long-term projects aimed at the creation of a healthy and happy society, and be globally competitive.

Another huge disadvantage of this model is that it actually encourages emigration, as when a closed society reduces its numbers yet receives more financial assistance, the money can be appropriated by a smaller number of people.

We must face up to the truth—we don’t produce competitive products or services. Yes, we have several successful companies in the finance and IT sectors and food manufacturing, but their share isn’t particularly large. We talk a lot about entering foreign markets, but we don’t always realize that those markets are extremely competitive, and we can only compete if we produce innovative and high quality products with a high performing workforce.

You can stay afloat for a while by building expensive restaurants without proper ventilation systems or grand hotels with one elevator, producing fake brandy or re-exporting Turkish tomatoes as Armenian, but eventually this will catch up with you.

We talk a lot about the need for attracting foreign investment, but we don’t always take kindly to investors. If we talk about the model of an open country, we should understand that, as well as its advantages, the model also brings specific challenges. One of the main challenges is the level of our readiness to accept that people of other national and religious identities from different countries—Iran, Turkey, Russia, Georgia—will come to our country not just to visit but to do business as well.

 

M.M.: Still, who should change the model you described, and how?

R.V.: I think the main challenge in this situation is for the President of Armenia. We can see that he has begun making changes in his appointed of Karen Karapetyan as the Prime Minister. This appointment is a serious change of the status quo and the first big step to the transformation of the model and the elite.

Another meaningful issue is the role and place of the diaspora, and its involvement in the affairs of Armenia. Starting this dialogue is no simple task, as the elites both in Armenia and the diaspora are not quite ready for it, unfortunately.

Although an independent Armenia has been the biggest dream of Armenians worldwide, the Armenian elite in different countries has failed to self-organize and, apart from rare exceptions, move to Armenia, as many prominent Armenians did in the 1920s, when living conditions here were much worse than they are now.

It is evident to me that the relationship between Armenians in the diaspora and in Armenia cannot remain like it has for the last 25 years.

Well-off Armenians from wealthy diaspora families continue giving money to charity mechanically, but except for the diaspora in Russia, perhaps, there are almost no new wealthy and successful Armenians who do it systemically, like they used to.

In the 20th century, representatives of the diaspora donated money necessary for keeping the traditions alive. However, charity is a form of support for the closed society too. Today money is needed for the development of the country, and that is far more complicated. Studies by McKinsey show that Armenia needs annual investment of $500 million (USD) in development projects for 15 years to double its GDP, and we can only dream about that right now. It is a perfectly achievable goal in the model of an open regional hub, and an impossible one in the old model.

As for the new Prime Minister of Armenia, I see a certain danger in terms of the inflated expectations that some people have, as they saw a “ray of hope” in Karen Karapetyan and don’t want to pay attention to his words about not having a “magic wand”. He has to lead the country out of a profound economic crisis and at the same time win the support of society without sinking into populism.

We should all realize the necessity of unconditional support for the President and Prime Minister in their efforts. Nothing will be achieved without that support.

The understanding that we are in a profound crisis should not lead to panic. On the contrary, an honest diagnosis and then concentrating all resources on the treatment will radically increase our chances of success.

We have to admit that the appointment of a new person to the position of Prime Minister offended a large group of people. If the model begins to change, the number of these people will grow. These processes started a year ago, when Samvel Karapetyan purchased the Electric Networks of Armenia. The company, which for years had been unprofitable and constantly demanded higher tariffs, in one year turned into an efficient and profitable enterprise. This means that some people lost their source of income, or their expenses increased and their businesses ceased to be profitable. Imagine what happens to them if they pay all their taxes and compete fairly on the market.

We will face a situation where society will have more and more people losing their jobs or income sources. At the same time, the new Government of Armenia has a tough task at hand in proving to people that the Government is efficient. The task is further complicated by the fact that reforms, which begin with very painful changes, should be carried out several months prior to the elections, and that their results will be seen only years down the line.

In these circumstances, it is very important to have an open dialogue on all levels, where we bring things out into the open. We are afraid of talking about many problems, although there is nothing to fear if the discussion is held in a civilized manner. We should talk to people a lot and explain a lot, make unpopular decisions sometimes. The most important thing is to go through with these decisions, as “half-reforms” in our country can lead to a complete collapse.

 

M.M.: It is hard to accuse you of passiveness, as you do a lot in Armenia and for Armenia. Nevertheless, should we wait for new steps from you in support of the efforts of Armenian President and Prime Minister? Are you ready to be involved in solving problems with your intellectual resources and large connections throughout the world?

R.V.: The decision on involvement of people with different views in this kind of intellectual discussion should be made by the leaders of the country. On my part, I can assure you that IDeA Foundation is already fully engaged in supporting the steps that are being taken.

We think that there is no alternative to the support for the Prime Minister and his team; we won’t get a second chance. After the approval of the new program, the government needs to put its plans into action immediately, and we are ready to contribute to this with our intellectual, financial, organizational and human resources, being completely aware of the fact that the program is still aimed at solving short-term problems and cannot reflect the full scope of the systematic changes required.

Not much time is left before the 2017 parliamentary elections, and there is, unfortunately, too much negative energy and anger within the public, which creates the threat of social unrest. Another serious challenge is apathy and indifference. It is very hard to wake people from their hibernation and stimulate them to get involved in the process of change. A lot of people, unfortunately, take this position – let him [the Prime Minister] try, and we‘ll sit and watch. This is a very dangerous attitude, because as I said, we will not have time for a second chance. If Karen Karapetyan and his team succeed, that means we all succeed, and vice versa. His failure will be our failure as well, and Karen Karapetyan’s success is vital for all of us, and I would especially emphasize, for Artsakh. If we do not have a strong Armenia, we cannot possibly expect to reach the right compromise on peace, which is necessary for the whole region. The situation around this issue has escalated during the last year, so we do not have much time for this matter either.

 

M.M.: One of the unpleasant “discoveries” of the April war was the feeling that the public and the army do not understand each other well and exist separately from each other. The new Minister of Defense Vigen Sargsyan proposed an idea of forming a “nation-army”, and by the way, he has already been blamed for trying to “militarize the population”. What are your thoughts on this idea?

R.V.: I think we have no alternative other than to do it. I just do not see another option. Israel has lived with this model for decades, and it does not stop the country from being a democratic state. In Switzerland, quite a neutral and peaceful country, people keep weapons at home and regularly participate in military training.

We have a long way to go to change people’s attitudes towards the army, and I am glad that the new minister has decided to start by bridging that significant gap. For example, we do not have consensus within the public on whether it is shameful or not to avoid service. Nevertheless, the army’s combat readiness is not only about the material-technical abilities and new weapons, but by the level of support the soldiers and officers receive from society. An officer should not be ashamed of going out in his military uniform; on the contrary, he should be proud. We need to fundamentally change the situation where the army is a “burden” for the state budget and peaceful life, and create an atmosphere where young men and even women aspire to serve voluntarily.

 

M.M.: Your foundation issued two statements on Syrian Armenians during the last two weeks and outlined the actions you will support. In my view, the situation with Armenians of Aleppo clearly demonstrates the sluggishness of state and diaspora structures, and the lack of readiness to take action. Different structures quote different figures on the number of people wishing to move to Armenia. Other institutions assure us that everything is all right with Aleppo’s Armenians and the situation is not as bad as it seems.

R.V.: The conflict in Syria, which has unfortunately led to the devastation of one of the oldest and most flourishing Armenian communities in the Middle East and the destruction of the cradle of Christianity, revealed several problems. First of all, going back to the beginning of our conversation, Armenian elites do not feel responsibility for the future of their nation. The second problem, which the Humanitarian Index (a study we undertook as part of the Aurora Humanitarian Initiative) revealed, is the fact that people think it’s the government’s job to find solutions to these kinds of humanitarian crises, not theirs. And the problem here is not poverty of the government or the people, but the indifference and lack of faith in the possibility that the situation will change. It was difficult to imagine several decades ago that Armenians would not extend a helping hand and a piece of bread to their compatriots in distress. This is not a matter of welfare, but a matter of attitude. Through the Aurora Humanitarian Initiative we help children from Arabic countries, refugees from the Middle East. This is also a matter of attitude – their ancestors saved our ancestors 100 years ago despite living in conditions far from being prosperous. We as a nation, which survived genocide, cannot show this kind of attitude to what is going on not far away from Deir ez-Zor, where the bones of hundreds of thousands of our ancestors rest.

There are many people in Armenia who want to help despite the difficult economic situation, but just don’t know how. This is why we decided to create a mechanism to coordinate these efforts. Our initiative not only aroused a big wave of positive energy, but unfortunately, some kind of behind-the-scenes commotion. I would like to add in regard to this that we did not and do not have ambitions to lead the process of supporting Syrian Armenians. Nevertheless, we do think that continuing to pretend that nothing is happening and looking at the matter of life and death of our compatriots as an extra headache, as many officials do, is unacceptable. There are different interests, “realpolitik”, but human life is invaluable. That is why we want to help in the creation of a mechanism to coordinate the efforts, providing maximum transparency and systematization, being completely aware of the fact that its only those who do nothing that criticize.

 

M.M.:We touched upon a number of tough questions, and I cannot help asking – are you an optimist or a pessimist?

R.V.: I am an absolute optimist, and I believe that despite all the hardships, we have a chance. I said a lot of times that the 21st century provides Armenians with a lot of opportunities. We need to get ready and take them, and we have all the advantages to do so. You have to keep putting one foot in front of the other.

20 Comments on Ruben Vardanyan: ‘We Won’t Get a Second Chance’

  1. Everyone should read this because Vardanyan lays out several systemic problems within Armenia’s criminal business environment, BUT, he avoids mentioning any credible solutions. Suggesting MORE diaspora investment into what he admits is a flawed corrupt criminal system – as the diaspora has been trying to do over the past 25 years – will result in more flawed corrupt criminal activity and business failures. The 800 pound gorilla and 2000 pound elephant in the room (the commander-in-thief/brutal dictator and his money hungry, tax evading, monopolist mafia) are still in the room! His suggestion to fully support them is suicidal for Armenia! This criminal dictatorship must first be eliminated by constant full pressure of delegitimization and the full application of rule of law!! Not support!

    • {This criminal dictatorship must first be eliminated by constant full pressure of delegitimization……}

      A few dozen SorosaCadres and SorosaNGO disinformation channels have been trying to, quote,”delegitmize”, the duly elected governments of Republic of Armenia for years.

      All have been abject failures.
      And all will continue to be abject failures.

      And anyone who is eager to “….first eliminate this criminal dictatorship…..” is welcome to got to Armenia and try.

  2. Robert, we don’t need advise from the likes of you.

  3. I agree with most of the assessments made by Mr. Ruben Vardanyan. After all, if everyone turns his back the other way and refuses to see what is happening in present Armenia, the current situation will worsen. However, the high level of apathy or lack of interest that exists within the citizens and the diaspora has been made possible only by the failed performance of the last three presidents who governed Armenia for the last 25 years. Unfortunately, these unqualified and unseasoned individuals with draconian Soviet style mentality have steered the country into disaster; that is, disaster in every sense. When Armenian became independent, many of us thought our small country will become a powerhouse in the region, a free, prosperous and happy society driven with democratic principles. A country where the population would stay in the homeland and the diaspora will repatriate to Armenia. As it may be, at the outset, the public had unequivocal support and faith in its leadership. Unfortunately, the leadership has failed to deliver. Now that the situation has blown out of control, Sargssyan wants to introduce reform by appointing Karen Garabedyan as the new Prime minister (PM). By the way, the new PM appears to be a very capable and seasoned manager. Should we support the new Prime Minister, is the billion-dollar question…On a balance, we probably Should. As Mr. Vardanyan said, ‘We Won’t Get a Second Chance’

  4. Gabe Korajian:
     
    Like many others, you repeat and spread the same old negative bromides about Armenia and its leadership.
    Not very helpful at all.
     
    1{ has been made possible only by the failed performance of the last three presidents who governed Armenia for the last 25 years.}
     
    What metric did you use to decide they have supposedly  “failed”?
    When USSR collapsed, Armenia was left with nothing.
    Do you remember when residents of Yerevan were cutting down municipal trees for heat?
    NPP shut down; natural gas lines from Russia being blown up weekly by Turks in Georgia; a trickle of heating oil being imported from here and there.
    About 50,000 dead due to a massive earthquake: 1000s and 1000s of families broken.
    100s of 1000s displaced.
    Infrastructure destroyed.
    Collapsing USSR leadership basically having abandoned Armenia SSR.
     
    A genocidal war launched by Azerbaijan to wipe out Artsakh’s indigenous Armenians.
    100s of 1000s Armenian refugees from Baku, Sumgait, Kirovabad escaping slaughter at the hands of Turkbaijanis pouring into devastated Armenia.
    Two Turkic “neighbors” blockading and trying to strangle little Armenia.
     
    Given what they had to work with, Presidents Ter-Petrossian, Kocharian, and Sargsian did an outstanding  job.
    Compare them to their counterparts in Georgia and Azerbaijan and tell us again how is it exactly they supposedly “failed”.
    Given the treacherous waters they had to navigate the small ship of Armenia, with everybody and his brother trying to wreck it, they did great.
    The proof is the undeniable fact that Armenians control more of their historic ancestral lands today than in centuries.
    Yes, all three made mistakes: who doesn’t ?
    And yes: there are many problems to solve still.
    But all this regurgitating of the false doom&gloom prognostications needs to stop.
     
     
    2{ thought our small country will become a powerhouse in the region, a free, prosperous and happy society driven with democratic principles}.
     
    What are you comparing Armenia with?
     
     
    3.{  A country where the population would stay in the homeland and the diaspora will repatriate to Armenia}
     
    Populations of neighboring Georgia and Azerbaijan did not stay in their respective countries either.
    Very prosperous, very democratic EU-member  Baltic republics are hemorrhaging their native peoples since their independence.
    Young Latvians, Lithuanians, Estonians are fleeing their native countries in droves: Why is that ?
     
    4.{ Now that the situation has blown out of control,…}
     
    What is blown out of control?
    Pres. Sargsian started discussing reforms years ago.
    Constitution was changed by voters to a parliamentary system in RoA.
    It will bring more stability and predictability.
    And the new government has a good percentage of technocrats.
    All good things.
     
    EPILOGUE
     
    Since independence Armenia and Artsakh and their people have faced many challenges and have overcome them all.
    When we – Armenians everywhere – work together, we can accomplish anything.
    Again, the proof is today’s RoA and NKR.
    Those who do not want to support RoA or NKR – Don’t.
    But please stop spreading negativism and defeatism.
     
    Unconditional love and support for Armenia and Artsakh.
    Nothing else will do.

    • Good points Avery, with one exception, when you suggested Ter Petrossian did an outstanding job. Were you serious about this? The way I see it, that was perhaps the worst thing that ever happened to Armenia at its independence. My opinion, the damage everyone is suffering today, not to mention the division we have, is because of him and his ilk. Had he gotten his way, there would probably be no basis for an Artsakh Republic today.

  5. avatar Gevorg Yepremyan // October 24, 2016 at 10:21 pm // Reply

    Avery, Norserunt – so, what do you suggest? Leave the bloodsucking criminals headed by Serjik to continue their oligarchic rule in Armenia? Is that better? Is you problem that all efforts thus far have failed or is your problem that there have been efforts. Rest assured its a matter of time before Serjik is gone and the likes of you are exposed.

  6. Not sure if those who write comments read the same interview I did. What Vartanyan says is for Armenians to set aside their differences and rally around the new PM to help him solve the problems. I would assume that being an educated and wealthy man who is famous for his philanthropic activities, he knows Karen Karapetyan well enough to trust him and throw his weight behind him. He knows very well that the system is flawed and he believes that Karen Karapetyan is the one who might be able to make some changes. Sadly, I see that Armenians are as usual busy pointing their fingers towards each other! One is suggesting that the only way out of this is to eliminate the current dictatorship, as if removing Serjik will automatically dismantle the whole oligarchic system. Another is accusing him of being on Soros’s payroll, as if criticizing Serjik and his corrupt system makes you a Soros minion(the kind of accusations you will see on Russian or Iranian TV channels!!). The president and his team are indeed corrupt and elections are rigged and those who deny these are simply delusional. But the way out of this is not revolutions, revolutions have never led to democracies and if the opposition could do it they would have done it by now. The only way out of this is for the leadership to understand that their system is dysfunctional and embark on reforms that will eventually lead to change. It is obvious that Serjik has finally realized this and came up with some new ideas(transition to parliamentary system, new electoral code, new PM) now whether this will lead to any real change or not depends on us and that is what Vartanyan is trying to say.

  7. avatar GARO Berberian // October 25, 2016 at 7:30 pm // Reply

    Telling people to support the government to solve the problems created by the very same corrupt government is ridiculous. the government have stolen 2 elections and responsible for sealing the country’s wealth. if the government wants to help solve the problems of Armenia then Sarkissyan and his mates could return the billions they have stolen, that might be a start then they need to move aside and let legitimate people who care about the Armenian people take power. But we all know they wont do that and blindly supporting these horrible people is not the way forward. The damage they have done to Armenia with their monopolies, destruction of 10 blocks of historic Armenian buildings in old yerevan for greed, the loss of 2 million people forced to emigrate, allowing criminal gangsters like liska, a murderer to govern and terrorise regions of the country stealing and doing what he wants, the rise of poverty to over 30 percent of the population, raising the dept to over 5 billion, and put into prison people who demand freedom and free elections.Supporting them in some kind of solidarity with the devil is not the way forward and unfortunately my friend people like Vardanyan coming out to tell us to support the government is just more window dressing to steal the next election and regain confidence of European institutions who no longer want to loan money to Armenia because it all gets stolen by the oligarchs.

    • He is not telling people to support the government, he is telling them to support the new prime minister and the reforms initiated by the government. You might argue that the ruling party has initiated these reforms to steal the next election but then the question is why would they change anything if they could steal the election anyway?! The answer is simple. They realized that their system does not work, they realized that their system is doomed to failure otherwise they would never bring an outsider like Karapetyan to be their next PM. If you think that a change of president and his cabinet are going to change an entire system, then you better have a look at Ukraine. Lets say Serjik resigns and leaves the office, what do you think is going to happen next? You think the oligarchs are going to return what they have stolen so far?! Or maybe you think the next president is going to arrest the top 20 wealthiest people and seize all their assets?! That will destroy the economy overnight. In case you have forgotten, it was Levon Ter-Petrosyan the fist president who laid the foundation of this corrupt system. Changing individuals is not going to change anything, Armenia needs a systemic change for people to stop selling their votes for 20 or 30 dollars, for people to stop venerating the likes of Dodi Gago(you never know, he might be the next president if Serjik resigns!!). That is why Vartanyan is investing his money on education instead of creating his own political party and jumping on the bandwagon. We, Armenians, really need to stop looking at things wearing these black and white glasses. We need to understand that building a democracy is a painful task which takes time and resources. It needs well-established political parties with their ideologies and principals and educated citizens who value democracy. There is no doubt that a parliamentary system is more flexible and power more divided, nevertheless we see that the opposition is unable to consolidate and form a strong block against Serjik which takes us back to the first question: Will a change of president change the whole system?

  8. avatar Sassoon Kosian // October 26, 2016 at 9:56 pm // Reply

    I have tremendous respect for Ruben Vardanyan but disagree with his view that we should all support the new PM. We could support but it would make no difference. PM is a temporary figure to mitigate the extreme tensions after Sasna Tsrer.

    The PM does not have real power. I have nothing against him, he may be an excellent manager and a leader. However, real power rests with criminal Sergik Sargsyan. As soon as the PM starts making real changes that damage Sergik’s brother and his entire criminal oligarchic support base he will be replaced. And there is no way to fix the economy without touching the oligarchy. I think he is smart enough not to get there and even if he had the guts he may not have time to do that – in half a year there are new elections, after which we may have yet another “savior” PM.

    These are all Sergik’s well thought out chess moves. I give him credit for that. But time is running out on him as well and he will no longer full people in Armenia and the diaspora. The best thing he can do is resign and disband his criminal Republican Party that has been rigging elections, stealing national resources and driving emigration for too long.

  9. Ritooli, that was a brilliant commentary. Bravo. Too bad your words will go over the heads of most people here as they clearly have a Western agenda.

  10. (Gevorg Yepremyan // October 24, 2016 at 10:21 pm)

    {Rest assured its a matter of time before Serjik is gone….}

    President Serj Sargsian’s term will expire in 2018.
    Hopefully he will remain an active member of RPA, and continue serving the Republic of Armenia. As you well know, unlike the likes of you, and other SorosaSanasarians who do nothing other than constantly protest, he has actually served the Republic in various important capacities.

    {…. and the likes of you are exposed.}

    I have been commenting at various sites, including ArmenianWeekly, for many, many years. My message is always the same. And I have already ‘exposed’ myself quite clearly.

    On the other hand you (generic you) SorosaCadres, SorosaSanasarians, SorosaNGOs, SorosaTVs, etc have been running around and spreading lies and disinformation about Armenia, while concealing the fact that you (generic you) are funded and/or supported by foreign elements who want to harm Armenia.

    The goal is to demoralize and psychologically defeat the people of Armenia, so it can be turned into a SorosaVassal. Like Ukraine, for example.
    Thank God, Armenians have a finely tuned instinct for survival, and have rejected all attempts of subversion. And the few misguided individuals who resorted to violence are resting comfortably in Yerevan jails.

  11. I am afraid that a lot of my fellow diaspora Armenians do not have a realistic grasp on the realities of Armenia, hence all this talk about “regime change, vote rigging, thugs, corruption” etc etc. This is all too easy to “find solutions” when you’re approaching Armenia’s problems from one dimension. But that is not the reality. Armenia has a multi-dimensional problems, and before any of you go calling for “revolutions”, perhaps you can make a case for what you will do for Armenia’s existential threats first, in case you manage to “free Armenia from the oligarchs and thugs”. What’s your defense against Turkey and Azerbaijan’s aggression? What’s your relations with Russia which can cripple Armenia both economically and militarily at any time?

    Even funnier, those calling to boot Russia out of Armenia. Armenia’s military and defense is entirely based on the Russian model and technology. What do you propose it will be replaced with? NATO?
    lol…

    If anyone wants to help Armenia and make it stronger, propose improvements to what we have rather than complaining about everything, especially when you’re not even living there.

  12. avatar Robert Davidian // December 12, 2016 at 3:36 am // Reply

    Too bad the criminal-election-and-billion$$-stealing-regime apologists here are expert bullies and liars, in addition to being huge paranoid name-calling assumption-makers throwing around words like western, soros and SorosaSanasarians, none of which apply to me. And they make off-handed suggestions like one must go to Armenia to try to remove the election and money thieves. I DO, 3+ months a year. I produced two documentaries showing massive election fraud. But my opinion and those opinions of most other commenters above expressing a deserved intolorance to the regime’s horrific theft of mega funds and elections and human rights – our credability/honesty/character is assassinated by the criminal regime apologists. WATCH! Just calling them out for what they are will set the off and triger their attack reflex…

    • I will also say, with each word they use to attack me and other concerned diasporans, they are pointing their hate speech in the wrong direction. Every word of attack SHOULD be pointed in one direction: to the criminals who continue to hijack the government as mega money, elections, and human rights thieves! OK, now watch them attack me instead… GO!

    • Yawn.

    • I smell a vile Soros operative.

  13. *burp*

  14. avatar Robert Davidian // December 21, 2016 at 3:59 pm // Reply

    Ah yes! I knew it! I rest my case! It’s all about attacking ME instead of the criminals running amuck as they hijack the government! Fascinating!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*