YEREVAN—Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan voiced concerns during a January 23 news conference regarding Azerbaijan’s unexpected backtrack in the ongoing peace talks with Armenia.
While the December 8 Armenia-Azerbaijan prisoner exchange suggested a positive development, Mirzoyan highlighted Azerbaijan’s failure to maintain a constructive stance since then. This shift was evident in Azerbaijan’s recent proposals on an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty and President Ilham Aliyev’s latest interview on January 10, marking a significant regression in the peace process on crucial issues.
“Unfortunately, after this positive step of December 8, we saw that Azerbaijan is not continuing with its constructive stance, to say the least,” Mirzoyan said. “That manifested itself through both the seventh Azerbaijani proposals on the treaty and the Azerbaijani president’s latest interview. There was a significant regression and even a blow to the peace process on a number of key issues.”
During a January 19 discussion in Croatia, Mirzoyan emphasized Armenia’s conscientious commitment to fostering lasting peace in the region. While acknowledging challenges arising from Azerbaijan’s lack of reciprocity, Mirzoyan highlighted Armenia’s active participation in negotiations, supported by the European Union and other stakeholders. However, he lamented Azerbaijan’s reluctance to resume talks on existing platforms.
Mirzoyan stressed the foundational principles guiding the negotiations, including territorial integrity, recognition, indivisibility of borders and mutual acknowledgment of sovereignty. He said these principles form the bedrock for a comprehensive peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan, and Armenia remains steadfast in its pursuit of a negotiated settlement that respects these principles.
Mirzoyan previously raised concerns on January 10 regarding the latest Azerbaijani proposals on a peace treaty, which he said show Azerbaijan’s reluctance to explicitly recognize Armenia’s borders. In response, during a January 10 interview, President Aliyev reiterated demands for Armenia to open an extraterritorial corridor to Azerbaijan’s Nakhichevan exclave and insisted on Armenian withdrawal from “eight Azerbaijani villages.” Aliyev also dismissed Yerevan’s use of the most recent Soviet maps for border delimitation.
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan rejected Aliyev’s demands, characterizing them as territorial claims. Mirzoyan reiterated on January 23 that Azerbaijan seeks to redraw its long border with Armenia, emphasizing that no one has the authority to unilaterally establish a new border. He affirmed Armenia’s commitment to reproducing borders drawn on legal grounds before the Soviet Union’s dissolution.
Despite the perceived risk of an Azerbaijani invasion of Armenia, Mirzoyan asserted that Pashinyan’s government remains dedicated to its “peace agenda.” On January 22, the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, expressed serious concern about Azerbaijan’s latest territorial claims against Armenia.
“The latest territorial claims by President Aliyev are very concerning. And any violation of Armenia’s territorial integrity will be unacceptable and will have severe consequences for our relations with Azerbaijan,” Borrell said during a news conference.
In response, the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry swiftly rejected Borrell’s criticism, accusing him of distorting Aliyev’s statements and inciting an aggressive policy against Azerbaijan.
Azerbaijani relations with the West have recently deteriorated, as Azerbaijan has accused the West of bias in favor of Armenia. Azerbaijan has proposed bilateral negotiations without mediators, a proposition that Armenia rejects. Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that while Azerbaijan is willing to sign a peace agreement on Russian territory, Armenia’s readiness remains uncertain.
The situation suggests a potential failure in the preparation of a peace agreement, with leaders of both countries evaluating the peace prospects differently. Russian expert Sergey Markedonov argued that while Baku leans towards a contained agreement without international guarantors, Yerevan insists on active external involvement in the peace project. With Brussels, Washington and Moscow distracted with other regions, a deadlock has emerged, hindering progress in various directions, including the formulation of the peace treaty’s text.
Amid the potential deterioration of the ongoing peace negotiations, PM Pashinyan has introduced a new perspective on a potential treaty with Azerbaijan. Speaking before members of his ruling Civil Contract party on January 19, Pashinyan said that Armenia needs a new constitution to reflect the “new geopolitical environment” in the region. “We must have a constitution that will make Armenia more competitive and viable in the new geopolitical and regional environment,” Pashinyan said.
Central to this discussion is the argument made by Pashinyan that constitutional reforms are imperative for any meaningful peace treaty with Azerbaijan. This perspective was articulated back in September 2022, when Pashinyan emphasized the need to revisit the declaration of independence. Pashinyan argued that changes to the constitution, including the annulment of the declaration of independence and a joint decision dating back to December 1, 1989, are essential.
Pashinyan’s call for a new constitution has come under criticism from the opposition, which says that Pashinyan is submitting to a demand from Azerbaijan. On January 19, five members of the opposition Armenia Alliance released a joint statement accusing Pashinyan of “preparing the ground for meeting another of the nonstop Turkish-Azerbaijani demands.” They said that Pashinyan aims to remove the preamble of the constitution, which refers to the 1989 unification act adopted by Armenia and Artsakh and calls for recognition of the Armenian Genocide.
During his January 23 news conference, Foreign Minister Mirzoyan admitted that while Azerbaijan takes issue with Armenia’s constitution, Armenia also has objections to parts of Azerbaijan’s constitution. “To say that the Armenia-Azerbaijan settlement process is the reason for the change of the constitution would be a gross exaggeration,” Mirzoyan said.
Armenian journalist Nairi Hokhikyan argued that manipulating the upcoming referendum in favor of constitutional changes is a pivotal move for Pashinyan’s political agenda. Hokhikyan said that Pashinyan faces a significant challenge in the upcoming elections. The ruling party has allegedly used strategies including changing governors and orchestrating local revolutions in communities to secure influence.
However, concerns persist about the risks associated with combining the referendum with parliamentary elections. Hokhikyan argued that the key to victory for the ruling party lies in a low turnout, which may be compromised by the simultaneous occurrence of a referendum. He added that organizing elections shortly after the referendum, when the electorate may be fatigued, could serve Pashinyan’s interests more reliably.
In the event that the opposition manages to sway public sentiment against Pashinyan’s proposed constitutional changes, the Prime Minister’s political standing could face significant challenges, Hokhikyan continued. The geopolitical dimension is also brought into focus, with contrasting expectations from Western nations and the Russian Federation regarding Pashinyan’s leadership and his alignment with regional partners.
The unfolding political landscape in Armenia remains under scrutiny as these strategic maneuvers continue to shape the country’s future.
Hoory Minoyan
Latest posts by Hoory Minoyan (see all)
- The Region in Brief - April 24, 2024
- Land handover commences in Tavush amidst Armenian outcry - April 24, 2024
- The Region in Brief - April 18, 2024
Utterly amazing that any Armenian, let alone the Foreign Minister, could ever think that the Turks can be trusted.
A Fortress Armenia policy is the only way forward.
Agree 100% in your comment, is unbelievable how prime minister of Armenia trust this wicked and evil enemy that only want to destroy armenian people and its country…
@Robert
The problem is most Armenians equate success of the Armenian state by the number of citizens owning a Mercedes Benz
These Armenians, coming from cities like Istanbul or NYC, spit on intellectual heavyweights like Khrimian Hayrig, who said Armenia’s only salvation would come through the land…
These so-called Armenians preach love with turkey, are violently russophobic, and extremely materialistic.
This myopic view has led Armenians to chaos, as they constantly get fooled by shiny things, like the supposed glitter of the west…
At this point, Armenia needs to take any external help it can get, along with building alliances with anti Turanist nations. Subsequently, the diaspora needs to be investing whatever it can in Armenia. The more investment and big companies, like Netflix, that come to Armenia, the higher the stakes are for the Turks to try and have their way.
I’m surprised that Armenian Weekly hasn’t had an article on this.
Armenia now has access to Iranian ports so that it can trade directly with India!
Excellent news!
https://jamestown.org/program/armenia-plans-to-use-iranian-ports-to-reach-india/
What a surprise, Ilham Aliyev is lying and wants to take more land.
Armenia needs to keep talking with him while not believing a single word of what he is saying. Hopefully those leaders in the world who actually care about the truth will factor Aliyev’s pathological lying that into their decision making and are now onto him. It is insane to have any discussion with this lying, murderous theif Aliyev without international mediators present on neutral territory. And finally changing the constitution to ostensibly bring about a peace plan with Aliyev just shows stupidity, profound weakness, and a lack of commitment to the foundations upon which the Republic is founded. The best thing Armenia can do is keep buying military hardware while forming alliances with non Turkic countries.
Any peace agreement without border demarcation is a blunder
Aliyevs goal– for now– is not to rock the boat, preserve and potentially increase gas revenue, build the army and populate newly invaded land. Half of the 40 billion pouring in is coming from Italy and Balkan countries, a good chunk going to Turkey and Israel for arms, drones etc. Erdogans main push is the get central Asian gas to europe thru TAP/Tanap pipelines by adding capacity and sell more defense products. Aliyevs aggression for now is controlled and curbed by Erdogan who has a bigger plan. Long term their plan is to take the southern part, syunik even lake sevan.
Armenia unfortunately is detaching further away from Russia. At this point Iran is the protector of status quo, outlining its red lines to Turks. I don’t know if Armenia can sign some sort of defense agreement with Iran. Demographics is reality, Armenia can not survive in that neighborhood without a solid mutual defense agreement with a big power
Which Balkan countries are those?
Serbia. The other ones Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary and Slovakia signed an agreement.
AZERBAIJAN AND TURKEY CAN’T BE TRUSTED. PERIOD. ARMENIA MUST NEVER BELIEVE THEM. EVER! WE HAVE LEARNED THAT ISRAEL IS ALSO A SNAKE IN THE GRASS WORKING AGAINST ARMENIA AND ARMENIANS, SO IT TOO SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE LIST. ARMENIA MUST STRENGTHEN ITS ECONOMY, DUMP BILLIONS IN DEFENSE AND DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS, AND ENCOURAGE MILLIONS OF NEW BIRTHS TO PRODUCE FUTURE SCIENTISTS AND SOLDIERS. EVERY MAN, WOMAN, AND CHILD MUST BE TRAINED AS SOLDIERS AND HAVE WEAPONS WITH AMMUNITION IN THEIR HOMES. GUNS! GUNS! GUNS! BUY EACH OTHER GUNS! IS WHAT KHRIMYAN HAYRIG SAID OVER 100 YEARS AGO. DIASPORA MUST WORK 100% AGAINST THESE TWO DICTATORSHIPS TO WEAKEN THEM AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
As long as Russia is busy defeating the collective West in Ukraine, Nikol and his gang of Russophobes and Turkophiles will continue destroying what remains of Armenia. Just a few years ago Ararat Mirzoyan was flagged by Armenia’s NSS a Turkish agent. Today, he is Armenia’s “Foreign Minister”. His announcement is part of the well planned process to draw Azeris and Turks into Zangezur, and afterwards blame Russia, Serj Sargsyan and Robert Kocharyan for it. And a majority of Armenians will once again fall for it because Armenians generally speaking are politically illiterate and out of touch with reality. These flaws are why Anglo-American-Turkish activist and agents of influence have gotten so far in Armenian society during the past three decades.
What do you get with Russia? Nothing… What did you get with Karabagh? Nothing?
I would rather trade all of Karabagh and Zangezeur for a new Mercedes Benz. We Armenians from Istanbul know that you can have a great life with Turks, not Russians.
Russians create nothing but Soviet junk. West, everything they touch is good. I also say you should make sure to get vaccinated against covid, and teach LGBT rights like how America does. Otherwise, you are a crazy Russian conspiracy theorist who watches David Icke or Alex Jones
Various excited statements namely nuclear weapons desires such resources would be much better invested in various guided missiles and drones and electronic systems and in good quantity to account for losses. Also as Russia has nuclear weapons it hasn’t deterred Ukraine nor has Hamas and Hezbollah and the Houthtis regarding their attacks on presumed nuclear power Israel thus the element of folly like the su 30 jets without weapons springs to mind.