News
U.S. Representatives Press Obama to Recognize Armenian Genocide
Representatives Join Senators in Sending Bipartisan Letters to the White House
WASHINGTON—Members of the U.S. House of Representatives have sent a bipartisan letter to President Barack Obama, encouraging him, this April, to properly affirm the Armenian Genocide as a clear case of genocide, reported the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA).
"We thank members of both the U.S. House and Senate for their bipartisan efforts to encourage President Obama to speak openly and honestly abou
Or, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.
Already a subscriber?Log in here
This story is FREE for you...
Create a free account to access this and four more articles, and get more sent to you with our e-newsletter.By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.
Who is going to vote against this, and what possible reason would they have for opposing it?
It should be passed unanimously.
Semantics are creepy. It’s not okay to finesse the definition of a word for political ends.
What Armenians survived was what the Jews survived: holocaust.
Tasmanians were victims of genocide.
Homocide: killing of a man.
Genocide: killing of a “race”.
There are no Tasmanians left. They are all dead. That is genocide. If you’re Armenian and you’re campaigning for the recognition of the systematic killing of your entire race – you are a victim of holocaust, not genocide.
Claiming you are mocks the fate of two Native American cultural groups and the Tasmanians who saw REAL genocidal destruction.
Again, Genocide and Holocaust are not the same thing and if the President has a brain, which he does, he will not bow.
My mother and grandmother were the victims of the Armenian Genocide. They walked seven months from Erzerum to Mosul where I was born. I have heard endless unbearable stories from other victims. It is sad that the United States and Great Britain refuse to recognize the Armenian Genocide for political reasons. What a shame? I wonder what Thomas Jefferson would have said?
I am trying to reach Loris Ohannes Chobanian, he was my fellow classmate in Tarkmanchadz Elementary School in Mosul, Iraq in 1946.
Every Armenian family have victims from 1915 !!
From Armenian genocide
My grandfather family were killed in ERZERUM
Turkish solders enjoyed to do that
WE need to see the bottom line,how the turkey is going to pay and if and how for their sin of the mankind.
They Can Start by Giving us our Land Back, of course they will not ,,, so its time to take it back.. and we need to stop handing the Azeris with kids gloves.
Encouraging and commendable job by the ANCA.
In my humble opinion, short of expectations and a bit of a letdown.
– 49 House Representatives have signed. 39 Democrats, 10 Republicans.
Republicans are still underrepresented.
Armenian-Americans who are leaning Republicans, for whatever their reasons and political thinking is, should exert more pressure on their Republican Representatives, to counterbalance the lobbying of the Turks/Azeris and the military establishment.
– 20 Representatives are from California. This is primarily due to the large Armenian community in CA, and can have an impact on elections. Great job by the ANCA WR.
– 6 From New York, 4 Mass, 3 Colorado,3 Michigan. We should be able to exert more pressure in these States.
– 2 each from Minn, Md. Ill, R.I, NJ.
– 1 each from FL, VA, Nev.
We have 44 States that have passed and recognized the Armenian Genocide Resolution. Only Representatives from 13 states have signed the letter. This clearly indicates that our efforts are more effective at the State level that the Federal.
Still a lot of work to be done.
Vart Adjemian
IF WE DONT SUCCEED THIS TIME WE WILL CONTINUE UNTIL WE DO
Semantics are indeed creepy.
Quite so: it is not OK to finesse the definition of a word for political ends, like you are doing, our Turk guest.
Very noble of you to try to come up with a new, political, Turkophile definition of the legal term ‘Genocide’.
Nice try: no cigar.
Read what the definition of the word ‘Genocide’ says: what it says about “in whole or in part” before you go thru your convoluted illogic to try to absolve your Turk kin of the crime of Genocide.
Also read up on Specific Intent (Dolus Specialis) to understand the difference between deaths as a result of unintended consequences, massacres, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and – Genocide.
And President Obama does have a brain: but like many before him, lacks the courage and integrity, being beholden to special interests.
And he will bow to his friend the radical Islamist Neo-Sultan Erdogan and the vile Turkophile Anti-AG lobby in US and will chicken out.
But it’s OK: Denialists have to keep wining every time.
We need to win once, and that’s all she wrote.
(Hazmik // April 9, 2015 at 4:30 pm //)
“vile Turkophile”
Really?
gen•o•cide (jĕnˈə-sīdˌ)►
n.
The systematic and planned extermination of an entire national, racial, political, or ethnic group.
You need only open a browser and type “define genocide” to get a definition. Keep grasping. Nothing about English is too difficult [for me] to grasp.
Also, Ottoman Turks do not exist anymore. Nice try yourself. Good luck in your quest for benefits.
Thank you
Hazmik,( whoever you are)
I never intended to dignify your comments with a response. Avery is performing that function quite well.
Now , I suggest you continue your argument with Pope Francis and the Vatican about the definition of Genocide.
May be, you can also explain why the Turkish government is so riled up ? Big wow!!! they called the Vatican Ambassador. What are they going to threaten the Vatican with?
Vart Adjemian
@vart Adjemian question is what are you hoping to achive by getting genocide recognized? the whole world can recognize it doesnt mean anything unless turkey does and do you think turkey will bow down to hostile approach by armenians? again what do you want? lands? compensation? citizenship?
(Hazmik // April 11, 2015 at 12:08 am //)
Yes, really.
You need only open the legal definition of Genocide to get the real definition, not the denialist Turkish make-believe version.
http://www.teachgenocide.org/files/UN%20Definition%20of%20Genocide.pdf
[The International Convention of the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide on December 9, 1948 set the United Nations definition of genocide:
General Assembly Resolution 260A (III) Article 2
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the
following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole
or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life
calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group]
{“ Also, Ottoman Turks do not exist anymore. Nice try yourself. Good luck in your quest for benefits.”}
Modern Republic of Turkey is the legal Successor State of the recognized State of Ottoman Empire.
Use your skills with the browser of your choice to look up what that means and what legal obligations it imposes on the successor state.
And we don’t need any so-called ‘benefits’ from descendants of Yurt-dwelling Turkic nomads from Uyguristan who are living on our lands: we want what was stolen from us by Turks and we will get it back.
Have no doubt.