Op-Eds

How Armenia can make the “Crossroads of Peace” concept more attractive

As Armenia and Azerbaijan continue peace negotiations, the restoration of communications has come to the forefront. This topic was included in the November 10, 2020, trilateral statement ending the 2020 Artsakh War, according to which “all economic and transport links in the

Already a subscriber?Log in here

This story is FREE for you...

Create a free account to access this and four more articles, and get more sent to you with our e-newsletter.

Or, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.

Dr. Benyamin Poghosyan

Dr. Benyamin Poghosyan is the founder and chairman of the Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies and a senior research fellow at APRI – Armenia. He was the former vice president for research – head of the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense Research University in Armenia. In March 2009, he joined the Institute for National Strategic Studies as a research Fellow and was appointed as INSS Deputy Director for research in November 2010. Dr. Poghosyan has prepared and managed the elaboration of more than 100 policy papers which were presented to the political-military leadership of Armenia, including the president, the prime minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs. Dr. Poghosyan has participated in more than 50 international conferences and workshops on regional and international security dynamics. His research focuses on the geopolitics of the South Caucasus and the Middle East, US – Russian relations and their implications for the region, as well as the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative. He is the author of more than 200 academic papers and articles in different leading Armenian and international journals. In 2013, Dr. Poghosyan was a Distinguished Research Fellow at the US National Defense University College of International Security Affairs. He is a graduate from the US State Department Study of the US Institutes for Scholars 2012 Program on US National Security Policy Making. He holds a PhD in history and is a graduate from the 2006 Tavitian Program on International Relations at Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.

4 Comments

  1. Thanks for a good analysis. I see the corridors as good ways for Armenia to leverage the interests and clout of other nations, notably India and Iran as counterweights to Azerbaijan.

    As a pipe dream, I would live to see the restoration of the City of Ani. It has 100,000 inhabitants and Artskah has 100,000 refugees!

  2. I don’t trust Pashinyan to negotiate anything with anyone.

    I don’t know believe that he works in Armenia’s national interests.

    Just look at the mess Armenia and Artsakh are in.

    I think he’s weak and takes the wrong side of every issue.

    Even on smaller issues, like removing Mt. Ararat from Armenia’s coat of arms, he takes an anti-national stance.

    There’s something seriously wrong with him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Back to top button