Since 2018 and particularly after the 2020 war with Azerbaijan (and Turkey), the Pashinyan administration has advocated for what they refer to as the “peace agenda.” It is the belief of the Prime Minister that it is in the best interests of Armenia to secure a peace treaty with Azerbaij
Or, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.
Already a subscriber?Log in here
This story is FREE for you...
Create a free account to access this and four more articles, and get more sent to you with our e-newsletter.By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.
“Pashinyan recently stated we can have peace if we focus on the 29,800 square kilometers being recognized as Armenia, and we will not ever have territorial demands on others.” Pashinyan’s government could not defend the people of Armenia and Artsakh and so he is now down selecting to say he can govern the 29,000 sq km of Armenia (formerly SSR) There is no evidence from the past five years that he can do that either, but instead is relying on promises of Azerbaijan and Turkey. We all know how that turned out, or will Pashinyan also close down Tsitsernakaberd? Pashinyan is clearly focused on economic development, which is important, but that development can easily be destroyed if there is no military defense to protect Armenia/Artsakh. There is a need for new leadership in Armenia (and in the Diaspora) to come up with better choices than what Pashinyan is presenting.
Csto’s three islamic country celebrated azeris when they occupied artsakh how we can expect respect from world while being ally with them armenians suffer in middle east arab states in turkey nd lran we must increase population our diaspora in islamic states should repatriate back to armenia there is no future for them