Special Reports
Armenia’s Stealth Fight for Decentralized Internet
In an unimpressive building located just behind a semi-abandoned Soviet-era theme park, programmers are building a decentralized internet for Armenia. Led by Vahagn Poghosyan, a prolific Armenian startup founder, and Enno Wein, a German expat who has worked in the tech industry for several decades, Leviathan seeks no profit. The scrappy startup is driven purely by a desire to reclaim cybers
Or, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.
Already a subscriber?Log in here
This story is FREE for you...
Create a free account to access this and four more articles, and get more sent to you with our e-newsletter.By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.
“All this added up to an increasingly monitored, authoritarian and manipulative internet that obstructs rather than encourages direct communication.”
While this particular statement is veeery appealing to New Age, Greenwich village hipster sensitivities, it is outright laughable. To talk about the “authoritarian internet” in an era where all traffic is end-to-end encrypted, when only the lazy don’t know how to use proxy servers and anonymous networks (e.g. tor), when any individual can start their own TV station (youtube) and newspaper (blog), when anonymity-based cryptocurrencies threatens the VERY concept of economic authority (!)…to do that is not just inaccurate but outright ridiculous. May I suggest that the Weekly, before publishing things like this, actually checks the accuracy of their statements with subject experts?
That said, and from what I understood from the article, Leviathan is trying to develop a distributed cloud storage system, using p2p protocols. Ok, but other than decentralization for the sake of decentralization (corporations are evil and hipsters are good, we get it), what does it give the users? If anything, this system will be very costly – there is a reason why Amazon and Google concentrate their servers in locations like NC, VA, and Oregon: it’s the low cost of electricity there. Distributing storage has multiple problems: the increased cost and usage of electricity due to extended distances, which will contribute to global warming; if a particular set of notes disappears (people shut down their laptops or lose wifi connections) then parts of your files become unavailable, and this is a major limitation that no user will tolerate.
Areg jan VPN cant prevent social networks and cloud space/computer providers accessing/processing/selling and conveniently leaking our personal data.
Neither can VPN turn the increasingly trans-national-corporate-friendly gradient field of modern globalization into an SME/family-business-friendly one.
Need to get rid of brokers (and even producers) leveraging the economy of scale back to SME friendly direct sales model. And from Advertisement-based economy back to search-based economy where people first pay for catalogue or search service to find the product they need – when they need it, rather than being interrupted by advertisement when they dont. Its a pollution in Info space the same way as economy of scale and of good-enough and of low margins is polluting rivers and air in cheap production plant constellation areas.
And for dragon-slayer not to become another dragon it needs to be headless. No broker at all levels: storage, search, payment, matching the seller – shipment – insurance – buyer – arbitrage and other services enyirely via P2P – mathced by decentralized system. We are not alone btw, there are many more. And we are coming…
And funny enough consumers dont feel the urgency of this as much as the powerful people playing major roles in broker organizations because latter see the system from inside – and even few of them who think that it is sustainable in long run – they are still sick and tired of it and in fact support us in material plane ;)
BTW TOR/Bitcoin and other anonymous systems can’t become ‘The Next Web’ because they are …well, anonymous.
Leviathan does not support anonynity and every message sent to peers or broadcasted to public is necessarily and inevitably forensically traceable upon report from the peer or public complaint – even simpler than in TCP/IP.
And yet – like CJDNS – it prevents illegal censorship and building walls in Internet through tech/money/power usurpation and miandering international or state jurisdiction.
google will put you on page 5 or 6 if you are not a paying customer.
you will not be seen in their searches. It is a manipulation.
Youtube unlike Brighteon will censor you if you do not align with their agenda or if requested by certain authorities. It is also a manipulatoin.
Farcebook and many others will also restrain you .
Most cryptocurrencies are banned because it does not allign with gov.agenda.
All private internet companies will tilt things in their favor when you use their services.
the simple fact that you have to know how to use tor and whatnot to keep your anonimity or be a computer savant proves it all.
lilitt is correct. keep your eyes wide shut.
Lilit never ceases to ooze sheer talent. Bravo.
Thank you for this article. The battle for who will control the internet is I think THE battle that will shape our future. The privatization of the public space (messages controlled by Google, software controlled by Microsoft, intellectual property controlled by Amazon and so on) is something that we must fight against
A link to their website and github (in case they have) would be nice. For an non profit organization who is looking to decentralize the web , I do hope they have a github repo