Sassounian: Azerbaijan, Turkey Inadvertently Protect Armenia’s National Interests

After reviewing hundreds of articles in regional and international media outlets and scores of statements by various officials regarding the protocols between Armenia and Turkey, it is clear that these agreements will not be ratified by the Turkish Parliament, unless the Armenian government first makes concessions on Karabagh (Artsakh).

As expected, there was great agitation against the protocols last week among opposition political parties in both Armenia and Turkey. Furthermore, some Azeri officials and analysts criticized Turkish leaders for appearing to go back on their repeated promises of not opening Turkey’s border with Armenia until the Karabagh conflict was resolved.

On April 22, when Armenia and Turkey made public a “roadmap” to regulate their contentious relations and open their mutual border, Azerbaijan strongly objected, threatening to retaliate against Turkey by taking a number of steps, including cutting off oil supplies. Turkish leaders immediately stopped the implementation of the roadmap in order to appease their “junior brother,” Azerbaijan. Turkish officials repeatedly announced that they would not open their country’s border with Armenia unless the Karabagh conflict was settled, to the satisfaction of Azerbaijan. Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan felt obligated to fly to Baku in May to make the same pledge in his address to the Azeri Parliament.

But as international pressure mounted on both Armenia and Turkey to go forward with the frozen roadmap, Turkish leaders were careful not to alienate Azerbaijan once again. This time around, they fully briefed Azeri President Aliyev during every step of their discussions with Armenia, repeatedly assuring Azerbaijan that its interests would be protected and that nothing would be agreed upon with Armenia, unless the Karabagh conflict was first settled. Just before the two protocols were announced on Aug. 31, Erdogan briefed Aliyev by telephone, and a high-level Turkish delegation flew to Baku for follow-up talks.

A close reading of the lengthy text of the professionally crafted two protocols and the appended timetable indicates that the most critical detail—the date of their expected ratification—is left out! The documents spell out in great precision the terms of the agreements as well as the specific deadline for each of “the steps to be undertaken.” For example, they state that as of Aug. 31, Armenia and Turkey have six weeks to complete “internal political consultations” before the protocols are submitted to their respective parliaments for ratification. The documents also specify the exact timeline for the opening of the border and the formation of various committees.

However, all of these steps are contingent upon the crucial prerequisite of ratification of the protocols by the two parliaments, for which no date and no deadline is mandated. The joint announcement issued on Aug. 31 by Armenia and Turkey simply calls on both sides to “make their best efforts” for the “timely” ratification of the protocols. The missing deadline is certainly not the result of an oversight!

After securing Armenian officials’ agreement to Turkey’s two preconditions—the formation of a “historical” committee and recognizing its territorial integrity—Ankara found a clever solution for its third precondition. It made the opening of the border with Armenia contingent upon the resolution of the Artsakh conflict, without including a direct reference to this requirement in the protocols.

Since the ratification of the proposed agreement by the two parliaments does not have a particular deadline, the Turkish government will probably apply its extensive diplomatic resources to pressure Armenia—via the OSCE Minsk Group of mediators on Artsakh, composed of France, Russia, and the United States—into making concessions acceptable to Azerbaijan.

Turkey could therefore be expected to delay the ratification of the protocols by its parliament until Azerbaijan’s conditions are met on Artsakh. In recent days, several Turkish commentators pointed out this gaping loophole in the protocols, boasting that Turkey would not open its border until Armenia makes territorial concessions on Artsakh. Turkey’s foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, made that same pledge practically on a daily basis since the Aug. 31 announcement. Interestingly, Aliyev has not said one critical word about this agreement which calls for the opening of the border with Armenia—something he vehemently opposes. The reason is that he is assured by Ankara that nothing of that sort will take place until Artsakh is delivered to him on a silver platter!

Armenia’s president and foreign minister, on the other hand, have been repeatedly stating that they will not accept any linkage between the Artsakh negotiations and the opening of the Turkish border. In order to preserve their own credibility and safeguard the country’s national interests, Armenia’s leaders should not make even the smallest concession on Artsakh and not ratify these protocols, until the Turkish Parliament ratifies them first. But, since Turkey refuses to ratify them without the settlement of the Artsakh conflict, the whole agreement could collapse and the international community would then hold Turkey solely responsible for its failure!


Harut Sassounian

California Courier Editor
Harut Sassounian is the publisher of The California Courier, a weekly newspaper based in Glendale, Calif. He is the president of the Armenia Artsakh Fund, a non-profit organization that has donated to Armenia and Artsakh $917 million of humanitarian aid, mostly medicines, since 1989 (including its predecessor, the United Armenian Fund). He has been decorated by the presidents of Armenia and Artsakh and the heads of the Armenian Apostolic and Catholic churches. He is also the recipient of the Ellis Island Medal of Honor.


  1. Sasounian:    Azerbaijan, Turkey    inadvertently  protect Armenian’s   National Interests………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Please  don’t  blame  me.    I  am not prejudice  But   I do not believe Turks                                                                   I  know Turks very well  I  live  with  them I  know  their culture                                                                         Neither  the   so  called  ” Road Map – protocol”  or  dropping   precondion  on   karabakh     Nor   Criticizing  Turkish  leaders  by Azeri  officials  or  “artificial”    silence  of  talkative  Aliyev,  can convince us  to trust them?                                                                                                                                                          We  are  sure  this  is  a  premediated  Turk-Azeri   political   game   to  deceive Armenians and Armenian  Government   (or  maybe  West.   I don’t  know?   God  help us…

  2. Armenian government of the last 12 years is a genius. It could make one enemy into two. Azerbaujan who was a semi-cousin in the Soviet era became a foe. Turkey (the susscessor of the Ottoman Empire), who had sinned against Armenians (and Greeks and Arabs and Kurds) for many times, is a foe for about five centuries, that is, from its birthdate. Georgian Government is a semi-foe, semi-cousin, and a semi-bastard (even not a full bastard). Iran which is a truly nobel nation is under the pressure of US falsified politics, and rabbit Armenian authorities are afraid to declare Iran their true cousins. Instead, Armenians are trying to swing in between the USA, Iran and Turkey (which is equal to political homosexuality). Even Russians — traditional allies do not trust Armenian Government. Isn’t this situation geniusly unique, and kocharyan-sarksyan clique proturkish, anti-humanist and contra-Armenian?

  3. Bottom Line,                                                                                                                                                                                  “Road  Map –   Protocol –   Opening  Border –  Dropping   Precondition”   of   Karabakh   issue  OR      Criticizing Turkish Leaders by some Azeri officials  and  artificial  silence  of  talkative  Aliyev,
    All  are  part  of  premeditated   Turlk-Azeri  political  game  to deceive  Armenian Government and Armenian  people                                                                                                                                                                   And  Unfortunately  when  Yerevan  Leaders  realize  their  political troubles,  it  will be  too late…

  4. Samvel Jeshmaridian, PhD writes: ‘Azerbaujan who was a semi-cousin in the Soviet era became a foe.’

    Azerbairjan practiced aggression towards the Armenians, it was the Russian military that squelched it and kept Azerbaijan as a Soviet state in line. I think, today, Azerbaijan is more anti-Armenian than Turkey.

    Please correct me if I’m wrong for any of the above…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.