Opinion

Inappropriate Academic Discourse

This week, we received a press release announcing an online petition organized by a group of disgruntled Armenian university students against what they call “falsifiers of Armenian history,” alleging that there is a concerted effort to falsify Armenian history within Armenian studies programs across the U.S.

The group says that this petition, which has been already signed by more than 1,300 Armenians, is “geared against the phenomena of falsification and distortion of Armenian history. Throughout many years, the false Armenological school has claimed that (1) the Armenian people are ‘newcomers’ and ‘colonists’ in historical Armenia and that the ancestors of Armenians arrived in the Armenian Highland in the 6th century BC and destroyed the ‘Urartians’; (2) the three outstanding fifth century historians, Pavstos Buzand, Movses Khorenatsi, and Yeghishe, are ‘pseudo-historians’; (3) the territory of Artsakh historically belongs to Azerbaijan, since the Turkic Azers are the direct descendants of the Caucasian Albanians.”

Already a subscriber?Log in here

This story is FREE for you...

Create a free account to access this and four more articles, and get more sent to you with our e-newsletter.

Or, subscribe now for unlimited access
By submitting your email address you agree for Hairenik Association, Inc. to send you communication by email.

Ara Khachatourian

Ara Khatchatourian is the editor of Asbarez (English).

3 Comments

  1. It is a sign of the intellectual health of a nation that there are dissident voices. But I agree that some of the claims sound strange. However – three cheers for democracy in Armenia!!

    1. Oh wow: we are deeply touched.

      We, Armenian posters @AW who are advised to continue our “inbreeding activities”, greatly appreciate an AG Denialist giving not one, not two, but three cheers for democracy in Armenia.

  2. It is not appropriate within academic discourse to muzzle unpopular views. Historical ‘truth’ can be/should be reviewed, examined, researched, challenged and otherwise ‘tested’ but not muzzled. False claims should be exposed and discarded once discredited.

Back to top button