Which VP Candidate Has a Better Record on Armenian Genocide Recognition?

Now that Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have selected their vice presidential candidates, Armenian Democrats are claiming that Senator Tim Kaine has the better record on recognition of the Armenian Genocide, while Republican Armenians are insisting that Governor Mike Pence is the clear-cut favorite on this issue. The more important question is: Does it really matter?

Senator Tim Kaine (L) and Governor Mike Pence (R)
Senator Tim Kaine (L) and Governor Mike Pence (R)

During his years as mayor of Richmond and governor of Virginia, Kaine was supportive of various Armenian issues, including Armenian Genocide recognition. As U.S. senator, he did not co-sponsor the Armenian Genocide Resolution, but voted for it in the Foreign Relations Committee in April 2014, only after demanding that all references to Turkey be removed from the resolution. He wanted to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide, without offending the Turkish government! Sen. Kaine has also not co-sponsored the currently pending Armenian Genocide Resolution.

Sen. Kaine received a C+ grade from the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) in 2014 because he:

1) insisted that the text of the Armenian Genocide Resolution be watered down before he voted for it;

2) did not make remarks in remembrance of the Armenian Genocide in the Senate;

3) did not participate in the Capitol Hill Commemoration of the Armenian Genocide;

4) did not co-sponsor the Haiti and Armenia Reforestation Act.

Gov. Pence of Indiana, Donald Trump’s vice presidential nominee, also has a checkered record on Armenian Genocide recognition, while serving in the U.S. House of Representatives, 2001-13. As a member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, he voted for the Armenian Genocide Resolution in 2005, but voted against it in 2007 and 2010 out of concern for its possible fallout on U.S.-Turkey relations, while acknowledging the Armenian Genocide. In 2012, his last year in Congress, Pence received a C grade from the Armenian National Committee of America.

Below are excerpts from Cong. Pence’s remarks in the Committee on Foreign Affairs on March 4, 2010:

“…I believe a genocide was committed against the Armenian people in the early part of the last century and it should never be forgotten. … The fact that more than 1 million Christians were killed makes the loss even more personal to me.”

Cong. Pence continued: “While we should never forget this genocide and the lives that were lost and the lives that are still marred to this day, I sadly cannot support this resolution. … Now is not the time for this Committee or the American Congress to take up the measure that is before us. … Turkey is a strategic partner in our ongoing efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. They share our interest in defeating international terrorism. … I rise today in respectful opposition to this resolution, but I do so with deep respect for those on this Committee and those who would be looking on that would have the Armenian people be heard on this point. While I cannot support this resolution, let them at least note that this American identifies with their loss, acknowledges those tragic events of so many years ago, and offers my condolences to the families who still bear the burden of what was in fact a genocide. I urge my colleagues to oppose this resolution.”

Having reviewed the records of both candidates on this issue, one should keep in mind that:

1) vice presidents do not decide policy; presidents do!

2) there is no need to argue over which candidate would recognize the Armenian Genocide, since it has been repeatedly recognized by the U.S. government as follows:

  1. a) official document was submitted to the World Court in 1951;
  2. b) Pres. Ronald Reagan issued a Presidential Proclamation in 1981;
  3. c) House of Representatives adopted two resolutions in 1975 and 1984.

Consequently, Armenians should no longer seek genocide recognition, but justice! The candidates’ position on this issue matters only if they have either denied the Armenian Genocide in the past or promised to recognize it, but did not keep their word!

There are, however, several other important Armenian issues that should be discussed with political candidates, such as, supporting Artsakh (Karabagh), pressuring Turkey to restore confiscated Armenian properties, providing larger U.S. foreign aid to Armenia and Artsakh, hiring qualified Armenian Americans, and improving trade and economic relations with the Republic of Armenia.

Unfortunately, regardless of what the issues are, one can never be sure that promises made by presidential candidates during the campaign will be remembered and kept once the president is elected and comfortably installed in the White House!

Harut Sassounian

Harut Sassounian

California Courier Editor
Harut Sassounian is the publisher of The California Courier, a weekly newspaper based in Glendale, Calif. He is the president of the Armenia Artsakh Fund, a non-profit organization that has donated to Armenia and Artsakh one billion dollars of humanitarian aid, mostly medicines, since 1989 (including its predecessor, the United Armenian Fund). He has been decorated by the presidents of Armenia and Artsakh and the heads of the Armenian Apostolic and Catholic churches. He is also the recipient of the Ellis Island Medal of Honor.

3 Comments

  1. Why even bring the subject up. There is gag rule on both!

    Armenians need to be stronger and stop believing. Learn from Tuckey and Israel how to manipulate the world powers. There is no justice on the side of the right. Right will be bowed to when Armenians get smarter and stronger.

  2. It makes absolutely no difference, as long as Turkey is part of NATO, and there are several NATO bases in Turkey.
    The US does not have yet the morale fortitude to “offend” a NATO ally,despite all domestic and international violations committed by Turkey. It is a very sad and disheartening reality.
    Turkey is an a mess. And it is going to get worse; but is able to blackmail and manipulate the members of NATO with threats of closing the bases.
    We should never vote for any Presidential candidate on empty promises that are never kept. Both Obama and Hillary are prime most recent examples.
    Vart Adjemian

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*