The Population Reference Bureau projects that the global population will reach 7 billion in 2011. This growth is measured based on several variables, including birth and mortality rates, as well as migration patterns. Is there a bureau somewhere that can project the future of the Armenian Diaspora? It is growing, stagnating, or receding? And what would be the measuring variables in order to predict whether the diaspora is headed for disaster or growth? Is the Armenian Diaspora vanishing?
I have been witnessing the involvement and commitment of those generations preceding mine—at times in awe, and at times critically, yet always in great admiration. Trailblazers for justice, guardians of schools, community centers, and faith, grassroots activists, conservers of culture, have all played an instrumental role in maintaining the structures and nurturing the identity needed to survive in the diaspora. I wonder if we, the current generation, have the same dedication, drive, and endurance to carry out the work ahead. I like to think that we do.
An optimist by nature, I usually dismiss the worried appeals made by community leaders or intellectuals who express concern about the future of the Armenian diaspora as over-reaction or strong protectionism. Some lament the fact that in places like Poland, India, and Singapore, Armenian graveyards, churches, and a lone school are all that stand, whereas in the past Armenians were a thriving community there. They once made considerable contributions to the local economy, culture, and society, as well as to Armenian diasporic life. Undoubtedly, it is a loss and how exciting would it have been to live in a place like Calcutta! On the other hand, it also seems like such extinctions are a natural occurrence for a diasporic people whose fate is far from being sedentary. Life decisions, unstable local economic and political conditions likely led Armenians once residing in these places to set roots elsewhere or even blend in local society, also an inevitable reality intrinsic to diasporic dwellers.
More recently, hearing a family friend talk about the Armenian community in Addis Ababa, where she was born and spent most of her life, I realized the prospects there look grim. I followed up by reading about the community and indeed, it seems as though the diaspora’s days in Ethiopia are numbered. The country’s political upheaval in the past, an aging Armenian population, the youth heading abroad for education and employment opportunities, as well as the low chance of Ethio-Armenians reproducing within the group, have led to a considerable decrease in the Armenian population.
Again, it is an unfortunate loss that hardly seems salvageable, but not surprising considering that diasporas are in constant movement and evolution and cannot be viewed as a static object.
Despite the mobile nature of diasporas, I doubt that diasporic communities in the West will be but a memory in decades to come. Nevertheless, preventively speaking, two conditions should increasingly prevail within our diasporic circles, in order to avoid potential dissolution. First, we need to seek ways and opportunities for creating sustained relations with the local society and other ethnic communities living in our respective cities. This need to open up and break free from insularity for good is a fundamental key to our survival. Marketing ourselves, establishing dialogue, offering our community and cultural space to the city at large, just as other cultural communities do, should be sought out actively. The days of protecting Armenian culture for Armenians are long gone. Instead, sharing and exchanging are in.
My second concern is ensuring that our most powerful resource—active and engaged individuals—are prepared to take up the challenge for generations to come. Community leaders are desperately trying to reach out and recruit the youth segment, sometimes successfully and on occasion unsuccessfully. As it is now, a solid core of active youth does exist within our diasporic communities. Though what can seem discouraging at times is a dangerously slim number of active individuals. The same faces are on the frontlines and the pool is too small in comparison to the overall number of Armenian youth. I fear that too many remain on the peripheries of diasporic communities. In an age where modes of communication such as the internet facilitate and strengthen diasporic networks in place, the time is now to mobilize and engage fresh, educated, and talented beads.
So, are we ready to step up to the plate? Will our diaspora consciousness survive for years to come, or will it weaken and drown in assimilation or indifference? Will it grow and be open to new formulations, or is it destined for a gradual demise? Is the ultimate antidote our now-independent and accessible homeland which feeds our diasporic consciousness with nostalgia and purpose, in turn, strengthening our commitment both towards Armenia and the diaspora? Either way, a blossoming diaspora only equates to a blossoming Armenia and vice versa.
Lalai Manjikian
Latest posts by Lalai Manjikian (see all)
- On the importance of teaching genocide in high school: A case study from Quebec - May 24, 2023
- Reflections on Hamazkayin’s Cultural Retreat - June 10, 2022
- Facing intergenerational wounds - October 15, 2020
Very true! Well said!
There’s a book by Hagop H Asadourian called “The Smoldering Generation” that elaborates on the dilution of the Armenian culture. It’s not a happy read. If I can say something positive about the future of the diaspora and the people involved that work tirelessly to keep it alive, it would be a quote by Sam Adams (context is different but idea is the same): “It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds.”
The long term future of the Armenian culture lies with Armenia. Those members of the diaspora whose primary identification is Armenian can best serve that identity by living in Armenia and working to build the economy and vitality of that country.
Unless, there is a constant outflow from Armenia to feed the diaspora it will inevitably dissipate. That is, the long term viability of the diaspora is in part dependent on the shortfall of Armenia as a viable state.
Our family, is an example of how a diasporan family may transition. We have had 5 generations in the USA. Two of them genocide survivors. Our identification is American. Our future welfare is tied to the USA. Our commitment is to the USA. We see Armenian as our cultural lineage not our raison d’etre. Of course, some may not transition as our family, others may be faster or others more protracted. Few individuals will retain an Armenia identity beyond 4-6 generations.
The future of Armenia rests with the people living in Armenia. They must be relieved of the stranglehold that restricts its integration into the world’s economic system, that restricts access to markets for its goods and it needs the economic lift of being an energy transfer avenue. Armenia needs people from the diaspora who have a strong Armenia identity to return and use their talents to build that country.
Thank you for your insight Gary, and for sharing your experience. Indeed, the future of our existence does lay in Armenia. And I could not agree with you more- Armenia needs more people from the diaspora…but how many of us are willing to move? The number of Armenians from the diaspora who repatriate is far too low and I don’t see that trend changing any time soon…
It would help if news about the quality of life in Armenia was a little more positive. Let’s face it, how many people want to immigrate to a country where 40% of the people interviewed said they would leave permanently if they could. It has been said that more than 700,000 have left Armenian to find a “better” life elsewhere. It’s about time thatour Diaspora leaders work hand in hand with the leadership in Armenia to get priorities coordinated.